You do a disserve to scripture and to the ministry of teaching when you do not quote the entire thought:
Proverbs 23:29-35
29 Who has woe? Who has sorrow?
Who has contentions? Who has complaints?
Who has wounds without cause? Who has dullness of the eyes?
30 Those who linger over wine,
those who go looking for mixed wine.
31 Do not look on the wine when it is red,
when it sparkles in the cup,
when it goes down smoothly.
32 Afterward it bites like a snake,
and stings like a viper.
33 Your eyes will see strange things,
and your mind will speak perverse things.
34 And you will be like one who lies down in the midst of the sea,
and like one who lies down on the top of the rigging.
35 You will say, “They have struck me, but I am not harmed!
They beat me, but I did not know it!
When will I awake? I will look for another drink.”
This passage is describing the troubles of those "who linger over wine" - those who are drunkards (v. 30).
Pain, grief, broken relationship, arguments, injuries, and mental dullness result from the abuse of alcohol (v.29).
The proverb writer goes on to use poetic metaphors to describe addiction:
(v. 31) A picture of obsession/pleasure - attractiveness of the color and appearance and the sensation of taste
(v. 32) A picture of a hangover from overindulgence - stings like a snake. The moderate use of wine does not produce a hangover.
(v. 33) A picture of hallucinations and loss of control. The moderate use of wine does not produce these effects.
(v. 34) A picture of incapacitation. A glass or two of wine in an evening does not incapacitate.
(v. 35ab) A picture of loss of memory and feeling. A glass or two of wine in an evening does not produce these effects.
(v.35c) A picture of addiction overcoming every other part of life. A glass or two of wine in an evening does not lead to addiction by itself.
Does this passage forbid the drinking of red wine?
Red wine was common in the culture. It is a vivid color and lends itself to poetic description.
The passage is not about the color of wine, but of addiction. Therefore, the answer to your question is no.