As I do not care who it is. But this is not simply a matter of preference. Refusing to name Christ so as not to offend is a grave issue. And bears more weight than abortion, adultery or homosexuality.
Charles Stanley has his own issues since he supports ME. I no longer consider anything he says. Very saddening.
And what makes you think that some one who knows Jesus as his Saviour would intentionally omit praying in His name except he either was ashamed or afraid?
Of course you do. However, we discuss what others are doing all the time. Some want to take it to the point of attacking the family and tearing them down instead of addressing doctrine. But that has not happened here in this thread.
Doctrine is open to discussion but personal attacks because someone preaches against ones pet sins is a different matter.
I personally appreciate threads like this because we are to be very careful and test all that someone teaches.
Knowing that Ravi compromised is enough for me to avoid him and his teachings, as well as not recommend his ministry to anyone.
I have always appreciated his ministry. But this is something to keep an eye. As well as anyone else that was involved in that event that condones this. I do not think he was necessarily alone in this.
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
Not sure what you mean...I think it's an attack on me, but I'm not sure, so I'll let it slide.
My comments earlier allude to your habit of posting often times inflammatory articles--some that are not even factually correct....just to stir up stuff.
You know you do it, and you should be ashamed of it.
It is too bad....there are other teachers from whom I have benefited in the past, but who compromise towards the end of their ministries...there must be quite a bit of pressure to do so, perhaps.
And yet you were willing to post an inflammatory and accusatory post without any knowledge of the article.
Well Good.
You assign motive you cannot back up and is untrue. But it is apparent that you do not like the criticism of doctrine of some specific people in any form. And as far as the articles being factually incorrect there are those who picked on small matters not relevent to the reason for the op.
He was preaching about Jesus Christ. I didn't know evangelism was wrong.
So once again.....
Revmitchell
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?
What was so wrong for Ravi to speak at the Mormon Tabernacle?