Joined:
Dec 20, 2011
Messages:
320
Likes Received:
0
Joined:
Mar 1, 2004
Messages:
10,295
Likes Received:
0
My guess is that Dr. Voddie Baucham is not overly concerned or feeling left out.
Site Supporter
Joined:
Aug 21, 2006
Messages:
9,796
Likes Received:
700
Faith:
Baptist
Baucham attributes his being invited to participate in the Elephant Room to "tokenism", but says "the racial overtones of this matter have gotten out of hand".
preachinjesus
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Feb 9, 2004
Messages:
7,406
Likes Received:
101
This whole Elephant in the Room thing is (while having some good features) troublesome.
For starters I'm definitely concerned about the celebrity attached with the people having conversations.
Also, having seen this going on, the arrogance of some of the pastors is unsettling.
I don't think its a good thing, for a lot of reasons. This is just another example.
Joined:
Feb 3, 2011
Messages:
4,991
Likes Received:
0
There’s two points of interest here. First, it is commendable and important to note that Baucham was actually invited to participate in this year’s Elephant Room 2, but rejected the invitation because of T.D. Jakes. Well done, sir, thank you for standing firmly upon the truth of the Word of God.
The second interesting point is found in Baucham’s response to a request for more thoughts regarding Jakes. He clearly notes that Jakes “dodged the question,” and was allowed by Driscoll and MacDonald to “use modalist language.” He then makes this interesting observation: “He [Jakes] was NEVER going to be confronted. He was an honored guest. He was not going to be penned down.” Baucham nails it here. By bringing in big-name Jakes, the men of the Elephant Room were able to widely expand their audience, and there was little chance that they would actually confront Jakes in his multiple heresies.
Click to expand...
I wholeheartedly agree!
preachinjesus
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Feb 9, 2004
Messages:
7,406
Likes Received:
101
Perhaps the larger point here is that Brothers McDonald and Driscoll proved they are ill equipped to handle insightful theological conversations. I noticed this in the transcripts I read too.
Joined:
Sep 12, 2006
Messages:
7,373
Likes Received:
0
This whole Elephant in the Room thing is (while having some good features) troublesome.
For starters I'm definitely concerned about the celebrity attached with the people having conversations.
Also, having seen this going on, the arrogance of some of the pastors is unsettling.
I don't think its a good thing, for a lot of reasons. This is just another example.
Click to expand...
I'm with you, too much celebrities. It's like 1 Corinthians 1 -4 all over again. Equally, we need Paul's Cross-centered rebuke.
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 26, 2003
Messages:
15,549
Likes Received:
15
Know any religious politicians who are?