Straw Man fallacy...Nobody here and evangelical Christian agree that logic that is not informed by faith is not godly. What we disagree with is the assertion that faith and logic are exclusionary. Logic is not evil. God uses logic all the time. The very passages that Michelle quotes above do, in fact, form a series of logical statements, and, since we affirm Scripture is God-breathed, that alone shows that God uses logic, affirming that He is, therefore, a logical being. Paul in 1 Corinthians even makes a logical presentation regarding the truth of the Resurrection. If the resurrection did not happen, we are doomed. If it really happened, we can logically show it did, using the Scriptures, which we can logically show that are historically reliable and that the only logical conclusion can be that Jesus really did rise from the dead, and we thus prove, logically, that what we believe by faith is also proven by logic. In fact, many people, like Josh McDowell, will tell you that it was through logic regarding this very thing, that they came to faith in Christ. If faith is not logical, then that could not have happened.
Yes, human wisdom is portrayed in a negative light many times in Scripture. Again, nobody disputes this. However, "human wisdom" does not equate to logic. Logic is the process of sound thinking or reasoning. You, Askjo, can try to connote that all you want by saying absurdly that logic argues against God and the Bible, but that's just not true. When human reason is portrayed as being against God in the Bible, it is always, repeat ALWAYS, shown alongside the idea that man ignores sound reasoning (eg. logic) and intentionally rejects that and even suppresses the truth (Romans 1).
We contend it is a rejection of sound thinking (logic) to say that faith and logic are exclusionary. We contend that faith without logic is a precipitous place, because that, is, in point of fact, the foundation of moral and theological RELATIVISM. Please find us ONE, just ONE evangelical, orthodox theologian who knows the Scriptures that says "faith and logic are exclusionary concepts," or, more simply, "faith is necessarily irrational or illogical."
Faith can be illogical, yes, in that logic is either not understood or sound reasoning is not employed. However, we contend that, faith, when thought through properly is underpinned securely by logic. Faith is therefore logical. Logic informs faith and faith informs logic.
I personally find this kind of anti-intellectualism here most disturbing. Why? Because we live in an age where we are called upon more and more to give an answer for the hope within us. We live in an age where we NEED to be able to handle basic Christian apologetics. If you can not use logic and you do not understand that your faith is grounded firmly in logic and vice versa, you will NEVER be able to handle witnessing to a hardcore atheist or a cult member in a way that they can understand. It is no wonder they find us irrational and portray us the way they do.
I repeat faith MUST be logical ultimately, but that does not require we be able to logically prove or know or defend the faith in order to exercise faith in an embryonic sense. I do not reject the notion that it is good and right to believe in Christ as Lord and Savior "because the Bible says so," as a Christian. That's the core thing by which we are saved. However, I also affirm that that faith is grounded in real truths and truth is inherently logical, even if I don't know all the "in's and out's" at the moment. I also contend we need to get beyond that embryonic level if we are to make the most of the minds God gave us. It is sinful to do otherwise. IT CAN/SHOULD BE N

THER WAY. God says in Hebrews tht anybody that comes to Him must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those that seek Him.
If that is not logical, then we are in serious trouble. Can we use logic to prove that God exists to somebody that has no respect for the Bible? YES....The Psalms say as much. The creation itself screams that He created it. Man, in his "wisdom" repudiates that LOGIcAL conclusion and rejects God and supresses the truth.
However, logic can prove our faith in God is correct. It's called the Cosmological argument. Aristotle figured out that there was an Unmoved Mover, whom the Athenians called the Unknown God. Paul used this as the springboard from which to preach and REASON with the Athenians from that very touchpoint. "God has set eternity in the hearts of men, yet they do not comprehend it." TRUE. Aquinas used Aristotle to develop the cosmological argument, and we still use it today to show God exists.
This same kind of logic goes on to show us what God is like. We reason that because we exist, God exists, and we reason that no actuality can communicate to any potentiality something that it does not have itself. We reason that the perfections within the Creator exist within creation in some measure, but imperfectly, because only the Creator is pure actuality. All else is contingency. We reason, eg. think. We use logic to think. This is undeniable, because to say we do not exist, we must exist,and to deny we use logic, we must use logic. Therefore, it can only be that we exist and we use logic and that our logic can be used correctly if we just put our minds to it. Now, since we know God exists (also logically), we say that God must reason (which Scripture says and shows), and, since perfect reason is perfectly logical, God must be perfectly logical, since God uses logic in Scripture (Scriptures already shown). Now, if God uses logic, and He is pure actuality, and illogic is unsound thinking, therefore a characteristic of a contingent being, not a purely actual being, we know that God can not, by His nature be illogical in any respect. This means, therefore, that God can not and would not condone the use of "illogic" in any sense. In fact, Scripture supports this in Romans 1 by showing how man suppresses the truth (which by definition is logical) when he even knows the truth about God. God requires faith. Therefore, since God is perfectly logical, the faith He requires of us needs to be informed by logical thinking. Faith, truly Godly faith, will always be logical. Logic, truly correct logic, will ALWAYS, lead to God, as long as it is based on correct premises.
You can have faith without logic. You can have logic without faith. However, it's not meant to be an either/or proposition. I think that those that say that they are opposing propositions are, in fact, afraid that if they say otherwise they will have to put their beliefs to the test. They fear logic, because they think it won't lead to God.
Folks, it won't. It doesn't. Liberals like to say that their logic "proves" God does not exist, that Jesus did not die or did not rise from the dead, and all kinds of things. However, like Norman Geisler said, EVERY...I REPEAT EVERY unbelieving objection to theism and Christianity contains a logically self-defeating premise. Logic can be sterile, but for the believer, it is one of the greatest tools we have to understand our faith and show to unbelievers that our faith is real and not just some irrational leap.