windcatcher
New Member
It is important to recognize that not everyone who goes to a RC church is catholic or understands their doctrine: Not everyone who is a member of the SBC understands their doctrine: And is it possible that not everyone who is a Mormon, really understands their doctrine? Is it possible that a person who is of hindu, or islam background and practice, can still pick up the Bible and/or get the witness of the gospel, and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ as their savior and lord, and yet not understand enough of the depths of the Scriptures or the teachings in which they were brought up to recognize the error immediately in their duallity of beliefs? And, if it is in their background, as in some churchs which we call 'Christian,' that the only exposure of teaching is more social or 'feel good' or prosperity messages and not doctrine........ more of how to be good little representatives.... Mormons, or hindus etc., than a real knowledge of what and why they believe and practice what they do..... then how can we be so certain that they are aware or fully ensnared in the error of their doctrine to not have received the saving faith of the gospel of Christ?Marcia said:We are also supposed to expose false teachings and defend the faith. We may not have to say who is saved and who isn't, but we certainly are to say when a certain teaching/religion is contrary to the truth of God's word.
I remember conversation with a friend who went to South America to live with a native tribe and learn the language so that the Bible could be translated to them: She and her husband had to learn what were their words for diety and build upon that. It is a little like Jesus talking to Peter, after the resurrection: Peter, lovest (agape) thou me? Peter replied Lord thou knowest that I love (Greek word for love like a friend) thee! Jesus asked him 3 times the question: The first two times it was with the word 'agape', but each time Peter acknowledge his love for the Master as that of a friend....... not having his understanding yet open to the magnificence of God's kind of love. The third time, Jesus asked the question and used the language which Peter fully understood, and he left off questioning Peter after Peter had answered him the third time. On another occasion, Jesus was accused of saying that he was God. Jesus reply was a reference to scriptures which say you arel gods: This did not mean that man was God or could ever be God.... but he was using the vernacular of their day in answering......... How could they themselves publicly teach and read these scriptures, and then condem him for what they perceived him to be saying, when they themselves had stated otherwise in the reading of their own scriptures? When I think of Bush, or Obama, or others saying 'we all worship the same God,' I think they err, not knowing the scriptures, and can judge that error but not their faith....yet, neither are they theologians, and may yet be still shallowly rooted Christians with much growth ahead to gain understanding that any belief in a diety or a god doesn't mean a belief in the God:
Nevetheless, not every person who says that they are Christian, is grounded in the true faith, and it isn't always apparent when all you have is one's profession and their fruits, but have no knowledge of their beliefs or doctrine identification or denomination, to judge beyond what evidence you are told and given. I know if someone asks me about church or beliefs..... I'm inclined to tell them right away that I am Christian and trust Jesus Christ for my salvation.... I usually don't immediately jump to "I'm Baptist"............. Particularly because 'Baptist' is a name given to and accepted by a particular group of people..... but the body of Christ to which I belong is much larger. The name Jesus gave us is the church.... and the world gives us the name of Christian.... and rightly so, if it be that we follow the one by which name we are called.