Featured Grand jury reaches a decision

Folks have been saying "two years" for a while now. He won't be relieved of "his duties" for almost 26 more months. That is, unless he declares martial law and assumes a dictatorship.

 

Highly likely .... but the same fear was being discussed when Clinton was POTUS. Besides, Obama said yesterday that people were wanting that "new:car smell" when it came to the presidency. Sounds like he can hardly wait to get out :wavey:

 

How is that throwing gas on the fire? They are justified in being upset. Wonder how many white Americans weren't justified in being upset when OJ got off?

Because of the sin in men's hearts.

That's laughable.

As I've said many times, God will continue to give all of you more of what you don't want and then some because the lot of you continue to dishonor and disrespect the authority God has placed over you.

 

That's the pot calling the kettle black again. Even more laughable than what you deemed laughable :laugh::smilewinkgrin::laugh:

 

Let's not make that comparison. White people don't have generations of mistrust with regards to the police in this country. When O.J. was acquitted white America didn't exactly feel threatened. While the anger in Ferguson may be misguided it is no way comparable to the O.J. Simpson trial.

 

You are the one who made the false equivalency in behavior.

 

You'll have to explain what you mean there. O.J. was brought up and you made the comparison in behavior with regards to rioting in Ferguson and the lack thereof with regards to the O.J. verdict.

You struggle with nuance and tend to see things as black and white. Those behavioral responses to a high profile acquittal are completely unrelated and I think you know that.

 

Perhaps the president can issue an executive order decreeing an end to all looting and rioting. :BangHead:

 

As did you when you made the statement about "how many white's burned down the town." That was your comparison not his. Your acknowledgment amount not seeing nuance is pretty much an admission of willful ignorance and it is why you often lack the ability to see underlying causes for what they are.

 

I'm not going to sit here and play Clinton like word games with you. You made that statement as an obvious contrast to what is happening in Ferguson and I'm saying that the reactions are not comparable.

You can reject my premise all you want but ignoring the full scope of a situation is an intentional refusal to utilize all information possible to come to a definitive conclusion.

 

So it should never had been brought up period at it is not a legitimate comparison that I apparently have ignored by saying it is not a legitimate comparison multiple times. Is that about where are right now? :laugh: It's also strange that you contributed to such an illegitimate comparison isn't it?

That was some impressive smoke and mirrors there Rev.

 

Um no, he asked if people were not justified in being upset when O.J. got off and then you decided to ramp it up to "how man whites burned down the town" which was in fact a direct comparison to Ferguson that you seem to be trying so hard to distance yourself from all of a sudden.