Slavery was common practice in most of the world at that time. I honestly don't give a rip, flip, or tater chip about slavery. What concerns me is your Yankee government butchering my people, stealing our land, and driving us onto reservations where we are still oppressed.
rsr, by the same token, the poor whites in the north were drafted while the plutocrat's kids bought their way out of military service while their parents profited in the industrial north by means of their majority in Congress which allowed them to prevent the south from free enterprise and so lined their pockets on the backs of not only the poor white's of the north, but also the poor white's and black's of the south.
The war was not as simple as many people seem to think.
Thanks Tom.
I have no problem with the history of the civil war being taught but I have a problem with those clinging to ancient history (like Reynolds) in a way that causes them to drive a car into people and spout bigotry.
It's over and done with and a pretty good country emerged from the ashes of the Civil War.
Let's not go backwards.
Well, got me on that one. So the fact that your Native American ancestors were abused by the southern states and the federal government (in thrall to the slave interests) forced your people to give up their rightful land means you love the Confederacy. The federal government has lots to answer for in the treatment of Native Americans. So does the Confederacy, which convinced many of them to join the South against their own interests.
Actually all he denounced was bigotry.
He wouldn't say the name of the enemy.
Sound like an argument you used to make with the last guy?
How can we defeat them if he can't call them what they are.
Tap dance out of that box if you can.
I am sure you did not mean to suggest that Reynolds would commit such an atrocity. However, do we know anything about the driver and what his motives were?
Tom, I am sure that, having read my posts over many years, you
do not think I believe "the war was as simple as many people seem to think."
The fact remains that if you read the resolutions of secession the overwhelming cause of the war was the protection of slavery. I will not post the resolutions here. They are available at many sites.
Both the North and South resorted to conscription because of the horrendous casualties. Many Southerners and Northerners were forced to fight against their will.
If you want to argue Northern capitalism vs. Southern slavery, we can do that.
But to say that the North prevented the South from developing a diversified economy, that is just wrong. The Southern planters were making incredible amounts of money from slavery and saw no need to change their ways when they were on top of the pyramid.
If you want to criticize the Northern capitalists who ground down the laboring class in the Gilded Age, I'm all for that.
No, it's not over.my people are the most oppressed group in the United States. Until we get the land back you stole and until you honor your treaties, nothing is "over."
McAuliffe is a spineless left wing agitator in his own right.
He's very picky about whose violence he condemns.
In fact, he himself is largely to blame
for what is happening now.
Destroying evidence of history he personally disagrees with, just like the taliban,
was bound to draw a reaction from someone.