Yes it has - according to Steve Anderson
Has the IFB went liberal?
Discussion in 'Fundamental Baptist Forum' started by Salty, May 28, 2020.
Page 1 of 5
-
-
I can’t deny he has a following.
-
he at least as taken on the Sda on youtube!
-
evenifigoalone Well-Known Member
I'm a former IFB, so perhaps.... They'd look a lot like me?
I don't know anything about Steve Anderson
Sent from my SM-J737T1 using Tapatalk -
Based on the Wikipedia article, the New IFB comes across as cultish. Their views, if the article is accurate, seem far from Baptist traditional views
-
Where are you at now in your walk with the Lord?
-
I was a bit facetious saying the IFB is liberal -
The point being that Anderson is Ultra-ultra-ultra -fundamentalists
But then again when a person is given a label it is often relative.
For example, lets say Anderson does not even own a TV (which would not surprise me)
so if he were to say any IFB who owns a TV is no longer a true IFB - which makes him a liberal. -
evenifigoalone Well-Known MemberHonestly I'm rather hurting right now. In multiple ways. Some of it inflicted by other Christians.
Sent from my SM-J737T1 using Tapatalk -
well. anyone caught with using the nas or Esv must be a heretic to him!
-
Sorry to hear that, hopefully will find help and encouragement here!
-
evenifigoalone Well-Known MemberI'm definitely liberal by their standards!
Sent from my SM-J737T1 using Tapatalk -
Using the term "fundamentlist" in a very belittling, derogatory way. KJOnlyist may be made up of professed fundamentlists, but KJOonlyism is not fundamentalism.
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite SupporterThat’s tough to hear... that Christians hurt you. But we are not all mean spirited. I hope and pray you feel better and if you need to talk just reach out OK!
-
Who also happens to belong to the KJVO sect!
-
Your comment to my post #12 does not make any sense.
-
Think mean #14, comment was that pastor is KJVO sect!
-
Marooncat79 Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
How?
-
Squire Robertsson AdministratorAdministrator
Read the wiki article linked to in the OP. It has no specifics that I could read, beyond most IFBs are not as bloody-minded as Anderson's group seems to be.
-
Would you prefer the title "FUNDY"? And yes, at least it used to mean the King James was the only version that wasn't a perversion, and so these others were rejected in the English.
And there's a problem with this because......... -
1) How can Fundamental be derogatory?
I am proud to be considered a fundamentalist!
2) I would consider all KJO to be ultra fundamentalist!
So "37818" let me ask you - what is your definition of a fundamentalist?
Page 1 of 5