HeirofSalvation
[/QUOTE]
Looks like he thinks he can here:
Then he says this:
Arminius, after serving as minister for some time, was called to the University of Amsterdam to teach as a professor of theology on the condition that he would adhere to the Belgic Confession (a Reformed confession that upheld biblical ideas surrounding salvation, God, His decrees, the nature of Christ, and other important topics). Arminius pledged loyalty to the Confession when entering the professorship. However, though Arminius gave allegiance to the confession, he really did not believe it. He was a scandalous, double-minded, shadowy and insincere individual.
Again he makes a clear statement right here about todays arminians-
Hos....are you telling me ,you have not seen these very things posted right here on the BB????
I have seen all these things posted here. You might not agree with MM...but do not say he is not putting it clearly.You cannot expect he is going to put the contents of 3 volumes into what he speaks of as a brief article.
After appealing to the 1644 wcf to briefly outline truth. he says this;
Again...you do not like what he offers, but it is so if followed through.
Here is more of what you say he does not know;
Historic VS Contemporary Arminianism
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Earth Wind and Fire, Mar 5, 2013.
Page 3 of 9
-
Iconoclast Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Regarding this that was posted...
What complete, comical, disasterous nonsense. May Almighty God grant true enlightement to these dear ones. -
HeirofSalvation Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
OK ICON you begged for it: Now, for three seconds...stop "correcting" people and learn something you did not know: You wanna hear where your boy McMahon is wrong? Here goes:
This is a scandalous accusation of brethren ICON....your boy McMahon will NOT demonstrate this as true...he will merely assert this devilish accusation without warrant. You believe his false accusation with no proof: NONE.
He falsely accusses a brother, and you chuckle in glee as a man is falsely destroyed, with ZERO proof...this makes me sick. McMahon provides NO evidence for such horrendous accusation, and yet you warm yourself to it...
VOMITOUS!!! I SPIT on this GARBAGE!
Here's a gem from you:
So.........I called the article "stupid"...and it is not "childish" to do so ICON...now... I await your "correction" oh, wise one.
Do explain to us Clearly...how much you and Mcmahon understand about what Arminians believe...Please "correct" us...because, as far as I know, neither you nor he know a whit about Arminianism...he may be merely stupid, or he may be a liar....YOU.......I do not call a liar. -
HeirofSalvation Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Gosh Iconoclast, this might be a new low for you.
Whew. -
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
-
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Yesua1, you asked me....
But in His great love he offers salvation to mankind. Every human being who has ever lived has oportunity, as all recieve Light that can be heeded or rejected. Faith, and faith alone is the only condition. And of course, it goes without saying that placing ones faith in Christ is a NON-WORK.
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
You just described the classic 'synergism'.
Fatal to any sound doctrine of salvation because it increases the place of the human being (Totally God's created creature) and thus diminishes the glory of God in salvation)
Very much like Roman Catholicism, which insists that the will of man is the decisive factor for salvation. -
EWF..
You didnt adress your post to anyone.
Are you replying to my post or someome elses? -
-
-
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
I don't know of any Christian or group of Christians who believe that we are saved by our will. -
Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Page 3 of 9