If You Can't Question It, Don't Call It Science

at risk of incurring some serious adverse effects.

Kinda omitted that ... and you're assuming this data is correct in the first place. I'm suspect of that data BIGLY, especially given the total death count hasn't increased beyond statistical deviation from the previous 10 years. So this indicates death causes are shifted to CV. The deaths haven't been increased by CV. some have apparently died who wouldn't otherwise have, to be sure, but the MAGNITUDE of this is the measure ...

meanwhile adverse effects are disregarded by those who advocate for the cv jab. now 10K in the US alone ... and arguably MUCH higher, but just 10K deaths by the cv jab. for a disease which is almost 100% survivable by relatively healthy and relatively young people.

Just doesn't pass the smell test, Jon. Especially when it's been shown repeatedly ... the cv jab isn't preventing infection NOR transmission. Far more breakthrough cases than reinfections.

 

yeah, the definition of a vaccine. roger copy. Changed for the cv jabs. got it.

after a year, now, it can be said the cv jabs may reduce the symptoms ... but is there adverse affects to the immune system? has any Lancet like publisher done/found authentic studies there?

when the the numbers are so low, orders of magnitude aren't hard to achieve, right?

if one cv jabbed died, and 12 non-cv jabbed died ... that's a 1200% increase of non-cv jabbed. Which also happens to be a classification problem because one isn't considered cv jabbed for 2 weeks after the second shot, right?

And I'll be dipped if that isn't a factor in the accounting. Odd that. vaccinating DURING the p(l)andemic as Geert has so aptly warned against, yet here we are!

 

Lol. Wow. I taught spin recovery in the airplane, but I think you’re in an unrecoverable situation

“bail out bail out bail out!!!”

 

I need to see information regarding the infection rates ... and who wants to volunteer to be injected with covid19 after they've been "fully cv vaxed?"

The increasing number of breakthrough cases shows pretty clearly the cv jabs are not anywhere close to Pfizer's 95% effectivity number ... but worse that the protection against transmission is nil is the big difference for battling a pandemic.

take the chicken pox shot ... and have a strong basis for understanding ... "ain't contracting chicken pox" Ditto MMR.

Such is not the case for this jab. Been too many "cv jabbed only events" with breakouts/super spreaders ... yet ... any of the college football games where there are orders of magnitude greater buzzing around maskless (I know it makes no difference, but i'm 'jabbing' the idiotic requirement) and yet ... no appreciable increase in the 'rona contractions.

... this for my Millennium post!

 

Hmm ... I wonder what is happening here in the Hoosier State?

Insurance CEO says deaths up 40% among working age people, and it's not just COVID

"The number of hospitalizations in the state is now higher than before the COVID-19 vaccine was introduced a year ago, and in fact is higher than it’s been in the past five years, Dr. Lindsay Weaver, Indiana’s chief medical officer, said at a news conference with Gov. Eric Holcomb on Wednesday."

@JonC ... have you read this article?

 

I have no substantial expectation of catching MMR, nor a whole host of things for which I'd have to refer to my buried USAF shot record.

what is becoming clear is that this jab is FAR FAR worse in its protection than any approved vaccine which proceeded it ... and worse ... it's not preventing the transmission of the disease either.

Did you see where the insurance companies are now seeing 40% increase in working age deaths ... non-covid! That's kinda concerning, yes? why are 18-64 y/os suddenly experiencing this radical increase ... I think they call it "three-sigma?" increase is once in 200 years.

Now we have a 100 year pandemic with a 200 year non-pandemic disease increase in deaths just in the last two quarters?

 

why are we dismissing the chickenpox vaccine? How many vaccines are required to demonstrate the cv jabs are a far cry from the claimed 95% efficacy number?

 

I tagged ya in the article I referenced.

I mean ... I suppose they could be fabricating their numbers, but wouldn't that be conspiracy theory?

 

why doesn't 'the chickenpox vaccine count?

how many failed vaccines does it take to demonstrate the cv jabs are not providing 95% efficacy as advertised ... they aren't even reaching 30% given the rate increases of breakouts.

But hey ... by the end of February '22, the real human trial will have existed as long as the polio vaccine trial lasted. So we're getting close! Exciting, yes?

 

@JonC

have you read this article in this post?

#108

 

this is part of the problem with our response starting last year, but restricting surgeries to only "life saving" passed over a year ago. If folks aren't getting treated, it's their decision, not a policy which restricted treatment.

Could the increase in working-age deaths POSSIBLY be associated with the cv jab rollout/promotion/coercion? Would CNN report it if it was? (and by CNN, the "accepted media")

Is it possible enough of the entities are so vested in this cv jab to end the pandemic narrative ... there's NO WAY the truth will be known by man's devices?

 

that's right ... it's a different vaccine. But taking that vaccine confers with it a high expectation of avoiding the contraction of the disease without additional numbers or degree of risk factors for adverse effects.

Just read about ANOTHER cruise ship in Lisbon which had another breakout of covid19 despite all being "fully vaccinated." You couldn't pay me enough to get on a cruise ship right now ... but the cv jabs are supposed to get us back to normal. Is being confined to quarters on a cruise ship normal? Serious question, I've never been on a such a cruise.

52 of the crew. Mercy ... how many crew a cruise ship? They must have participated in their own super spreader event.

COVID outbreak ends cruise for thousands on German ship in Lisbon