Just saying that historically, that some of the proponents of Arm /non cal theology regarding Sotierology have had to adjust off the Substitutionary model of the Atonment to one of the other theories held in Church history...
Think they were honest, and faced that IF they held to jesus substituting for all, as he is said to have died for sake of all...
That would force them to eventually have either sinners left in hell , with jesus paying for their sins, or else forced to adopt Universlaism...
There are/were held other theories regarding atonement in the church....
Is it true cals affirm a substitutionary View of Cross/While Arms/Non calls Would not
Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by JesusFan, Dec 3, 2011.
Page 3 of 3
Page 3 of 3