So why was it not admitted that the buildings were brought down by explosives?
And however could the murder of 3,000 civilians be justified to "minimize(d) structural damage to the surrounding landscape."
Really trying hard to even image conspiratorial forces at work here.
look, I went though this with the death of my hero JFK, I was in the service at the time. Within months there were a half dozen theories of who killed JFK, within years maybe a dozen. People just refused to believe that LHO acted alone.
It was the MAFIA, it was LBJ, it was the Russians, it was the CIA ...
each theory was iron clad with documents.
So like I said, I am Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome with conspiracy theories.
Yes sir. Modern ballistics have 100% proven there was absolutely nothing magical about the "magic bullet." Conspiracy theorists go out of their way to believe junk.
You've swallowed the entire governmental line without due consideration of a whole series of anomalies that day. You've just dismissed them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous government fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
You've swallowed the entire conspiracy theorist line without due consideration of a whole series of imagined anomalies that day. You've just accepted them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous conspiratorial fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
Funny. I do not know if there was a conspiracy. I do not know if there was a backup shooter in place if needed. What I do know is Oswald was the only one that shot. It was a rather easy shot.