Yes. I would like you to read the one where God commands the Jews to slaughter millions of people.
That is the real Bible.
I would like you to read the one where God told Noah to institue the death penalty.
I would like you to read the one which NEVER abrogates that teaching.
And so that's why God told Noah to institute a law MEN were to shed men's blood if they committed murder???
Hmmmmm....
All they have to do is read the Bible that never says men are supposed to STOP killing murderers and those who threaten national security.
Jesus and the death Penalty?
Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by 12strings, Apr 23, 2013.
Page 15 of 18
-
Who was it given to if not the Jews? No one said it was exclusive for the Jews. when God comes and speaks to US and gives His righteous judgment to exact the same kind of final judgment , then we too may do that. But I'm still waiting for your proof that He's speaking to you or any other man today and telling them to take a life as He did with the Israelites.
-
-
HeirofSalvation Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
You are either willfully ignorant of this, or worse, you are intentionally being deceitful.
Genesis 9 is the Scripture you are given............and it is NOT given to "Israelites"..beyond that, you obfuscate and defy Scriptural correction.
Dust.....
feet....
off......
shake.....
I will answer you not again, except you cease this Zeitgeist of pretending that this is unique to Judaism or "Israelites" because that is false, and "Israelites" were not even a discernable people-group when the injunctions in Genesis 9 were given. -
Do you not see how silly this is???
You could follow the same line of reasoning with tithing. The only ones who were supposed to do it were the ones who got it DIRECTLY from the mouth of God.
You could apply it to commands about adultery. the only ones who were supposed to be faithful to their wives were the ones who saw the lightening and heard the thunder on Mount Sinai!!
They are also the only ones who were ever supposed to remember the Sabbath day.
And since we cannot pass judgment on murderers then we cannot pass judgment on ANYBODY.
The shoplifter has to be let go.
The bank robber CANNOT be convicted because only GOD can pass righteous judgment.
Do you not see how silly that is??? -
-
They are also the only ones who were ever supposed to remember the Sabbath day.[/quote]
The only problem with your analogy is that none of those had anything to do with one person having to make a judgment against another.
-
HeirofSalvation Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
Zaac said: ↑What I see is each time God wanted to take a life, HE gave the command to the leaders.Click to expand...
He gave ALL of them to leaders.
They are also the only ones who were ever supposed to remember the Sabbath day.Click to expand...
God instituted the Sabbath from the very beginning about two thousand years before he gave the command to the Israelites.
The only problem with your analogy is that none of those had anything to do with one person having to make a judgment against another.Click to expand...
If one is an open adulterer the church is to judge him and excommunicate him. This requires passing judgment.
There were these people in the Old Testament called "JUDGES."
They were not God.
They were people and they were expected, generation after generation after generation to judge God's people.
This "nobody passes judgment but God" mess is something of your own making.
It is certainly not biblical. -
Zaac said: ↑He's the only one who can RIGHTEOUSLY deem someone worthy of death. Otherwise we are all guilty of breaking the same law, and thus are incapable of righteously making such a judgment.Click to expand...
NOBODY but you thinks that we should not have people passing judgment on criminals of all sorts.
Your line of reasoning is silly. -
Revmitchell said: ↑How convenient. Since He did not address the death penalty issue you cannot make that judgment except by your own bias.Click to expand...
You believe the scriptures are inerrant, do you not? I don't use that word, but I choose to believe what Jesus said and taught. Strange that you do not. -
HeirofSalvation said: ↑False....Christ "BECAME" sin for us....and that deserved death. In the sense that the Father counted it....Jesus did indeed deserve "death". I am not (as a non-Calvinist) utterly wed to all of the precepts of the Penal Substitution theory of atonement as they tend to be....But there is MUCH about it which is true indeed. And one facet of that is that God was punishing sin...REAL SIN....when he crucified his own Son. Christ "Became" sin...and God rightly punished it
The Scriptures defy you, and in absolutely NO uncertain terms: I quote the Scripture:
Gen 9:5 And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man.
Gen 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
That is the Word of God and you may despise it at your pleasure...but that is PRECISELY what it says....You will note that this has NOTHING, ZILCH, NIL NADA to do with Levitical Law, but is an eternal precept stated after the flood LOOOOOONGG before the Levitical legal system was in view. That's inescapable.
The trick used is to pretend that ANYTHING in the Old Testament is under the banner of Levitical Law...That's false and deceitful upon it's face.
The world according to God's Holy Word existed for at least 2,000 years prior to the Noahician deluge, and there was no such thing as a "JEW". The first 5 chapters of Genesis (if anyone cares about what the Bible says) tells us about what is fully ONE-THIRD of all human history...33% There was no such thing as a "JEW"...until centuries AFTER the Noahic covenant either until Abram's calling. The Potempkin argument of equivocating anything in the OLD Testament to Levitical Law is a deceitful Zeitgeist. The Death Penalty doesn't rest upon Levitical Ordinance....It rests upon eternal absolute judicial decree.
The murder of Abel by Cain speaks to this issue CLEARLY!!!! Cain made the (obvious) assumption that as a murderer, he was subject to death by any who would avenge Abel.....
However, God decided to grant to Cain a special "mark" to prevent such a reprisal. God did NOT say or suggest that Cain should not fear that, or that death was not a fair penalty for murder, but rather that he had a special purpose which he NEEDED to specify by a special "mark" to protect him.
The Scripture is CLEARLY in favour of the Death Penalty. Like it or lump it.Click to expand...Click to expand... -
HeirofSalvation said: ↑Why????
That's the "Blood-thirst" you accuse others of....I don't desire that.. Casey Anthony was acquitted. ACQUITTED.....As in, there was insufficient evidence to condemn her. YOU may desire the death of Casey....but us Death-penalty proponents have no desire for the shedding of innocent blood. She "MAY" have been guilty....but you, I think, stand alone, and on an island as desiring her death. You are too quick too desire dealing out death and judgement.
I believe in the death penalty.
I do not believe that Casey Anthony has been sufficiently proven in a reasonable court of law as having deserved it.
BTW: This is Florida..........Florida executes more women than even the State of Texas does....We will fry a chick in a heart-beat.............but only if they deserve it.
Anthony has not been legally demonstrated to deserve death. Having followed the trial, as a Floridian....I believe the trial was masterfully executed. The judge was impartial and a brilliant jurist. It was done correctly IMO....and if you lust for her blood, than you are wrong.Click to expand... -
Luke2427 said: ↑The Bible is more than just what is highlighted in red-letter editions.
We don't get to ignore thousands of pages of the Bible for convenience sake and then say we just believe in following the words of Jesus.
The words of Jesus are no more the words of God than any other of the words of the Bible.
ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration of GOD.
There is no where in the Bible where God says- "OKAY, now you can start ignoring all that other stuff I authored and just cling to the words of Jesus."
Interpreting the Bible in context is always essential. It is difficult at times. It means we have to discern between directives given only to a specific people at a specific time (like, 'kill every man, woman and child of Jericho) and when the commands are universal.
But, just because it is difficult at times, it does not mean that we get to just CHUNK most of it away for convenience sake.
That is a terrible hermeneutic.
There is no, absolutely no, biblical reason to think that the several passages advocating the death penalty are no longer applicable.
Even if the New Testament did not REPEAT them, we should still apply them because the New Testament does not say we should do away with them.
Until you have a passage that clearly states to do away with something in the OT- you embrace it.
You don't get to arbitrarily take scissors to the Word of God to suit you.Click to expand...
Jesus clearly had an ethical message that was quite different from that presented in parts of the OT. That cannot be denied. -
Luke2427 said: ↑So how is that false? Christ STILL didn't commit any sin. The folks who put Him to death didn't have any idea that He would take on all sin, so they STILL had no way to righteously judge and put Him to death.
Because he was slaughtered for OUR iniquities- and here is the important point- BY GOD.
He was not sentenced by Herod and Pilate ultimately. He was sentenced by GOD.
God who GAVE us the death penalty, also PRACTICES the death penalty.
That same God told us in HIS WORD to utilize it.
To be against it, is to be against the Word of God- plain and simple.
Since when did God give us permission to ignore the Old Testament??Click to expand...
I believe we are to follow Jesus as the founder of our faith. And His ethic cannot be equated with that of parts of the OT. -
Thomas Helwys said: ↑God did not kill Jesus. That is part of a definition of the atonement that I find, well, I'll not describe it here.
I believe we are to follow Jesus as the founder of our faith. And His ethic cannot be equated with that of parts of the OT.Click to expand...
The OT has not been abrogated. Gods values did not change in 3 AD. -
Luke2427 said: ↑That's dualism.
The OT has not been abrogated. Gods values did not change in 3 AD.Click to expand... -
Thomas Helwys said: ↑I don't lust for her blood, you idiot, and I highly resent you saying that. Look, the broad was guilty; there is absolutely no doubt about it. But in rambling on about that, you misrepresented and misunderstood my point, which was this: The fleshly part of us may want to see murderers executed, but Jesus did not condone that, and we should follow Him, not our own fleshly desires.Click to expand...
And if you believe that another person is worthy of death because of his sin, then believe that you are too.
We always want to believe that the other guy is worse than we are and due the worst punishment. But scripture directs us to do just the opposite.“Let nothing be done through selfish ambition or conceit, but in lowliness of mind let each esteem others better than himself. Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but also for the interests of others.” Philippians 2:3-4 -
I used to support the death penalty. I now believe for Christians to support the death penalty is contrary scripture and the specific command of God's Word to show mercy toward the worst of sinners.
I Tim. 1:16 "And yet for this reason I found mercy, in order that in me as the foremost, Jesus Christ might demonstrate His perfect patience, as an example for those who would believe in Him for eternal life." NAS
The Apostle Paul had just explained how he was the foremost of sinners because of His persecution of the Christians. He says in Acts 26:10 he persecuted Christians even to the point of casting his vote to have them killed. Paul was a murderer of Christians.
The I Tim 1:16 passage is clear. Jesus showed mercy to the murderer Paul as an example of perfect patience to be followed by those who would believe in Christ for salvation.
Support for the death penalty, IMHO, is contrary Christ's command to follow His example of perfect patience when dealing with the worst of sinners, even murderers like Paul.
peace to you:praying: -
canadyjd said: ↑I used to support the death penalty. I now believe for Christians to support the death penalty is contrary scripture and the specific command of God's Word to show mercy toward the worst of sinners.
I Tim. 1:16 "And yet for this reason I found mercy, in order that in me as the foremost, Jesus Christ might demonstrate His perfect patience, as an example for those who would believe in Him for eternal life." NAS
The Apostle Paul had just explained how he was the foremost of sinners because of His persecution of the Christians. He says in Acts 26:10 he persecuted Christians even to the point of casting his vote to have them killed. Paul was a murderer of Christians.
The I Tim 1:16 passage is clear. Jesus showed mercy to the murderer Paul as an example of perfect patience to be followed by those who would believe in Christ for salvation.
Support for the death penalty, IMHO, is contrary Christ's command to follow His example of perfect patience when dealing with the worst of sinners, even murderers like Paul.
peace to you:praying:Click to expand...
Page 15 of 18