You admitted it earlier. That's good enough for me.
Even though most English-speaking people,native and non-native as well do not use the KJV?
God's ways are apparently not your ways.
Just name one of the many who have died for the cause of the KJV translation.
KJV . . . rivers of living water . .
Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by makahiya117, May 14, 2013.
Page 3 of 4
-
-
Gregory Perry Sr:
That aside, it's a PROVEN FACT that the current KJVO doctrine is derived from Dr. Ben Wilkinson's 1930 book, Our Authorized Bible Vindicated, and that the myth was actually jumpstarted by two authors who DISHONESTLY plagiarized from Dr. Wilkinson's book and used the power of modern media to hawk their wares. So, KJVO has a man-made cultic, and dishonest origin, proving it's NOT from GOD. That leaves only ONE other possible ultimate source.....
And your 'dispensation' statement raises some concern that you mighta bought into the false 'Plymouth brethren, stuff of John Darby and William Marrion Branham.
Again-What authority/ability do you have to accept some and reject others?
And the NKJV is made from mostly the same mss as the AV 1611 was. What's your prob with the NKJV? It corrects many of the goofs in the KJV.
And again...Doesn't the dubious man-made origin of KJVO bother you? -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
I am not Robo but your apparent jab is concerning. Are you saying that only KJVO folks take Genesis literally? I am in no way KJVO and I believe that the scripture is very clear. Cain's wife was either a sister or niece. It can't be any other way without twisting the scripture whether on uses the KJV or an easier to read translation.
-
Are you actually trying to imply that if someone is wrong about one topic that they must be wrong about all topics?
Would you suggest that the fact that KJV-only advocates use fallacies and divers measures in their arguments for a KJV-only theory means that anything that they say is irrelevant? -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Demanding proof for a belief in KJVO, while believing the outlandish things he does, which he has NO Biblical support for either (actually the Bible refutes his belief), is the height of hypocrisy. Roby became irrelevant a long time ago, on many other forums he's considered a "nut". -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Would you also defend an atheist just because he agreed with you about KJVO? You can align yourself with roby if you want, but...........siding with someone who basically throws the entire first book of the Bible in the trash would worry me. -
Why didn't you just say so? Now, we understand what you are trying to say. Personally, I would put KJVOnlyism and the Gap Theory in the same category. Gross Error!!!
-
No Thank You
Sorry Roby...but I ain't swallowing your hook. I simply disagree with your conclusions just like you disagree with mine and I'm not going to be drawn into your circular argument. I absolutely disagree with not just some...but ALL of what you just said. Just cause you said it doesn't make it so anymore than me saying what I say makes my position so. I wish you well and hope you have a happy and fruitful walk with the Lord but I do NOT wish to engage in this argument with you. You have shown a propensity to display a "nasty" tone with your arguments that borders on accusation and I just don't care to engage in that. Either way....I think you are wrong and you just implied that I am being led by Satan.....you said above "So, KJVO has a man-made cultic, and dishonest origin, proving it's NOT from GOD. That leaves only ONE other possible ultimate source....."
I really have nothing else I'd care to say to you except that I pray that God will be merciful and kind to you just as I hope He will be so to me.
Bro.Greg:saint: -
Incredible!
Thinking back to the TITLE of this thread....
Man alive....we REALLY got some "rivers of living water" flowing here now...don't we???:rolleyes::eek:
Bro.Greg:saint: -
-
Thank You Bro.Luke
Luke2427 said: ↑Has it not occurred to you that the VERY HEADING UNDER WHICH YOU TYPE THIS POST IS CALLED....
...wait for it....
BAPTIST DEBATE FORUMS???
If you don't want to debate your position then don't state it.
or go to the fellowship forum or something.
But it is pure idiotic to refuse to debate ON A DEBATE FORUM!!!Click to expand...
Thank you for your very kind and gracious remarks :flower::tonofbricks: I hope you derive a great amount of pleasure and joy in stating them.
Bro.Greg:saint:Click to expand... -
It's not up for debate;GPS does not want to debate on a debate forum. His reasons are debatable.
-
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Seems since I've posted what robycop believes, he's been "missing in action". Too embarrassed by the truth about him coming out? Hmmmm.
In the past week I've spent time reading other Bible versions. I own a NKJV, an NIV, an HCSB, an ESV, an NASB, and several KJV's. I was raised on the KJV, and I just cannot enjoy reading another translation. I try, and I'll not bash them except to say there are a few I don't care for, the NIV being the leader. I simply don't like any Bible not translated from the same manuscripts as the KJV.
Anyway, when I want to study, read, glean, devote, learn from Scripture, I'll continue to use my KJV! It's been, and will continue to be, MY standard. -
Baptist4life said: ↑Seems since I've posted what robycop believes, he's been "missing in action". Too embarrassed by the truth about him coming out? Hmmmm.
In the past week I've spent time reading other Bible versions. I own a NKJV, an NIV, an HCSB, an ESV, an NASB, and several KJV's. I was raised on the KJV, and I just cannot enjoy reading another translation. I try, and I'll not bash them except to say there are a few I don't care for, the NIV being the leader. I simply don't like any Bible not translated from the same manuscripts as the KJV.
Anyway, when I want to study, read, glean, devote, learn from Scripture, I'll continue to use my KJV! It's been, and will continue to be, MY standard.Click to expand... -
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite SupporterYeshua1 said: ↑ANY of those versions not based upon the TR acceptable to you for use?Click to expand...
-
Baptist4life said: ↑Yes, they're acceptable to use, but definitely not MY preference. I have many brothers and sisters in Christ who use all the versions I listed, plus others. I just prefer, and honestly think they are best, versions translated from the same manuscripts as the KJV.Click to expand...
-
Baptist4life said: ↑In the past week I've spent time reading other Bible versions. I own a NKJV, an NIV, an HCSB, an ESV, an NASB, and several KJV's. I simply don't like any Bible not translated from the same manuscripts as the KJV.Click to expand...
-
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite SupporterRippon said: ↑Aside from the NKJV, the rest of the translations you cited are not based on the TR.Click to expand...
-
Baptist4life Well-Known MemberSite SupporterYeshua1 said: ↑So ytou be KJVP?Click to expand...
Page 3 of 4