Walguy said:In FL they kept REcounting with lower standards each time. I really have no problem with hanging chads, although there was no excuse for there being any. It was when pregnant and dimpled chads started being counted that the whole thing turned into a farce.
Similarly, I have no problem if people in MN went a little outside the lines as long as their intent was clear. But when two areas are both marked and one is crossed out, or when it is marked ambiguously in any other way, there is no way to know what the voter meant. It's just a guess, and elections are too important to be decided by guessing. Such voters could have easily requested a new ballot, but they didn't, so their improperly marked ballots shouldn't count. Those ballots should have been discarded, instead of being interpreted as votes for Franken, as the Dems running the recount apparently did in just about every uncertain case.
Also, at this point in MN it's not about additional recounts because of a close result, it's about trying to overcome the clear fraud that resulted in the extra votes that changed the winner of the election. Surely you would agree that those two circumstances are different.
Absolutely outstanding post, and no...LeBuick refuses to see the difference.:BangHead: