JJ: "it is an ethical matter to let readers know who the translators are, or at least give a source where they can find out who the translators are"
Agreed -- and yet for more than a quarter-century the Lockman Foundation steadfastly refused to give the translators' names for the original NASV, claiming it would take away from the glory to be given only to God.
At least now, everything is plain and above board for both the earlier and more recent NASV editions.
Modern Literal Version
Discussion in 'Bible Versions & Translations' started by 37818, Nov 23, 2018.
Page 2 of 2
-
-
John of Japan Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
-
FAQ's - MEV | Modern English Version
"the Committee on Bible Translation....represent institutions such as the Assemblies of God Theological Seminary, the College of William and Mary, Evangel University, Fuller Theological Seminary, Geneva College, Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Harvard University, Hebrew Union College, Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, Oklahoma Baptist University, Oral Roberts University, the Oxford Centre for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, Pentecostal Theological Seminary, Princeton Theological Seminary, Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary, Saint Leo University, the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Stanford University, the University of Notre Dame, Vanguard University of Southern California, Westminster Seminary California, Westminster Theological Seminary, and Yale University." -
-
It is claimed that MLV follows a majority text Well. . .
". . . And it happened [during] supper, the devil had already put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, in order that he should give him up. . . . " -- John 13:2.
I added the brackets. The word "during" is in italics in the MLV indicating the word is not from the Greek but provided by the translators. The majority text would read "supper being ended."
We know from Luke after the supper, Judas was at table prior to him going out. (Luke 22:20-21.) -
Sounds like someone is either allowing their theology to determine the text ("can't have an unbeliever present throughout the institution of the Lord's Supper") or is simply following the Nestle/UBS critical text (in which case no italics would be necessary).
I suspect the former. -
Young provided a Literal Transition in the 1800's which is not as fluid as this Modern effort. The few verses I compared were appropriate,
-
-
-
-
-
-
I ment post the following here.
Page 2 of 2