If there are any persons with swastikas present..... their purpose is likely one of two reasons...... either they are part of an extreme group and their purpose is less with the subject concerning the rest of the crowd and more to draw attention to themselves OR
deliberate actors and plants to cast questions and suspicion on others who are present and have legitamate concerns and opposittion.
Either way....... such symbols serve to label, divide, and create suspicion and often become the excuse of others who needed to target the opposition and then generalize charteristics as belonging to the whole opposition..
WC..... trying to imagine...... Nancy P with a goatee.... or what ever they call it.... arm band with broken cross...... her fist held high..... palm outstretched and open, looking high over a crowd and proud....
70 years ago......... It fits..... but she needs some more wrinkles, sags, and crows feet!
:smilewinkgrin:
Yep that's the one I tend to believe... It is also quite common for them to plant rabble rousers in a peaceful protest, just so they will have an excuse to meet the protest with force.
Great post, but I will add that plants are happening by both sides.
However, swastikas bother me far less than not allowing civil debate. Again, I am speaking about both sides. This is because the real victim is average Joe who is trying to understand what all this means to them and to give their elected representative their concerns.
Excellent observation my brother in Christ....but will you share some proof with this statement to me since i am not as well versed in the world as you are?
Are you saying that everyone on Patients First bus is a resident of that district. You don't think OFA don't have plants wearing union shirts. The problem we have is separating fact from the fiction.
When government began regulating it to death it became necessary to petition government to protect themselves from over regulation. The government intrusion is more correctly stated than government and business partnership.