• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

New HCSB

Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Askjo

New Member
Ehud said:
This book has been totally debunked. I challenge you to read Clouds book. "The KJVO controversy" He puts Davy boy to shame, then read "Modern Version Hall of Shame" :applause:

I would be embarrassed to be associated with the [snipped] versions.

We have Laodicean schools, producing Laodicean pastors, who use Laodicean Bibles, that have produced Laodicean churches. “Neither Hot or Cold” :sleeping_2:

EHUD & Co.
Click to expand...
That is true!!! Amen! I am on your side. :thumbs:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
K

Keith M

New Member
Here's a rule of thumb we can all follow. ANY book refuting the KJVO position is based on truth and fact. Any book supporting the KJVO position wallows in error and deception. That's the fact, and nothing can change it.
 
K

Keith M

New Member
The "usual suspects" are up to it again, promoting the error and confusion of the KJVO position. Those who stand against their errors are treated as if we were just as guilty as they are - when that is not at all the case. Might as well close the thread, Roger, since it was intended merely as a slam directly against the HCSB (and indirectly against the MVs in general) by one who is notorious for taking a stand against God's word in the MVs. On judgment day God will not view kindly those who [snip] His word by slandering and belittling it, and neither should we accept the [snipped] of the KJVO position today. If we don't stand against onlyism then we condone it.

He who is not with Me is against Me, and he who does not gather with Me scatters abroad. Matthew 12:30 NKJV
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
C

Cutter

New Member
If it's not the KJV you can use it as a commentary. It's only a Bible when it's inspired by God and not tainted by man's knowledge.
"Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth."
The translation (i.e. KJV) from the original manuscripts was efficient and sufficient. Since man thinks he is gettin' smarter he thinks he needs to revise the Word of God. Shame on him. How can you improve upon that which was complete in it's original form?
 
mcdirector

mcdirector

Active Member
Cutter said:
If it's not the KJV you can use it as a commentary. It's only a Bible when it's inspired by God and not tainted by man's knowledge.
"Knowledge puffeth up, but charity edifieth."
The translation (i.e. KJV) from the original manuscripts was efficient and sufficient. Since man thinks he is gettin' smarter he thinks he needs to revise the Word of God. Shame on him. How can you improve upon that which was complete in it's original form?
Click to expand...

Cutter, have you read Dr. Bob's Eleven Simple Rule's for Posting?
 
C

Cutter

New Member
Why am I not surprised a Baptist website is against one standing for and defending God's Word. Change the text, remove the Ten Commandments, remove school prayer, will the sheep not follow? Forgive my passion and burden over the sorry state of affairs in the e-christian community. And just to think, it all started when the KJV became an inferior version.:tear:
 
mcdirector

mcdirector

Active Member
I don't think that a single person here believes the KJV is an inferior version! I have never seen that stated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top