“I disagree with much of her judicial philosophy and expect to disagree with many, maybe even most of her future votes and opinions. Yet despite this disagreement, I know her to be a brilliant and conscientious lawyer who will analyze and decide cases in good faith, applying the jurisprudential principles to which she is committed. Those are the basic criteria for being a good justice. Barrett meets and exceeds them.”
...
“And when she is confirmed, I am going to accept it as the consequence of the constitutional rules we have and the choices we collectively and individually have made. And I’m going to be confident that Barrett is going to be a good justice, maybe even a great one — even if I disagree with her all the way.”
You are with this woman! May I ask what your understanding of RC faith is and do you have any experience with it? I’m really interested in your understanding is of the Catholic mind if any.
I had a whole semester course on church history in college, plus what I have learned in almost 65 years of living. But that is irrelevant to confirming ACB to the U.S. Supreme Court. Your attitude is so 1720, and I say that as someone whom the editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette once called anachronistic in an editorial.
Wow! You caught me!! I’ve never been a Roman Catholic.
If this is the best you can debate, then you really need to stand down and find something else that you can be competent at, or else read a book and learn how to debate properly.