Michelle, in her own words, equated scripture to the same level as God (while accusing me of version-idolatry). Yet you do not think that Michelle's judgement of me is unnecessary.
Non-KJBO lies
Discussion in '2004 Archive' started by RaptureReady, Aug 5, 2004.
Page 13 of 15
-
-
quote:
Originally posted by C4K:
So what do Spanish speakers, French speakers. German speakers do? Must they learn English? All of those languages are different from English. How do we know which language to trust?!?
Askjo: They have accurate translations in their mother tongue. Romans 16:26
Three observations leading to serious questions (which any KJVO advocate should be able to answer or admit that there is a problem in their claim in this regard):
(1) Coptic-speaking Christians in Egypt even to this day use only the Coptic version. That version has been of the Alexandrian type of text ever since the second century, and remains so today. Do the Egyptian Christians have an “accurate translation in their mother tongue”?
(2) Syriac-speaking Christians who continue to use the Peshitto have a NT canon that excludes 2Peter, 2Jn, 3Jn, Jude. Is their NT complete for them? Also, while the Gospels in the Syriac version are more strongly Byzantine, in the Acts and Epistles, “the Peshitta includes significant elements of other types.... about 30-40% of the whole” (Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism). With a truncated canon and a 40% non-Byzantine text in their Acts and Epistles, do today’s Syriac-speaking Christians have an “accurate translation in their mother tongue”?
(3) The Japanese people, since the introduction of Christianity, continually have had a translation in their mother tongue that was based exclusively on the Alexandrian type of text. They have never had a translation based on a TR or Byzantine type of text. Do today’s Japanese people have an “accurate translation in their mother tongue”? -
Askjo said "These MVs twisted Jesus' name in the NT 200 times!"
I really don't understand this. What does "twist" mean in this sentence? Can you provide an example? Which verses contain these 200 twists? -
Interesting post, Ziggy! Great information!
-
With all the allegations made by KJVO's that MV's seek to omit the name of our Saviour, delete references to His blood, etc.- I thought a quick software search comparing the KJV to one of the MV's might be interesting. Since the NIV seems to be the object of much of the KJVO venom, I chose to use it as the MV representative. Here's what I found:
The word "Jesus" appears in the KJV 942 times. The word "Jesus" appears in the NIV 1,281 times.
The word "Christ" appears in the KJV 532 times. The word "Christ" appears in the NIV 536 times.
The word "blood" appears in the KJV 375 times. The word "blood" appears in the NIV 395 times.
(Of course, "blood" may be used in other contexts.)
What does any of this prove?: nothing! In the logic of KJVOism though, one must wonder exactly why the translators of the KJV chose to use a personal pronoun ("He") in place of our Lord and Saviour's name in so many places! -
[ August 11, 2004, 03:37 PM: Message edited by: RaptureReady ] -
-
Using the "logic" you endorse, any sentence containing the word "ain't" would be false... because if one thing is wrong then obviously the whole thing is wrong.
It is equivalent to saying anything that isn't worded perfectly to the exclusion of all other wording is by default "wrong".
A child can "perfectly" report the details of a new toy... but I am under no delusions that their words are the "perfect" way to report the details of the toy. Writings or words are "perfect" in as much as they accurately transmit the intended message.
In any event, you didn't answer my question but rather tried to change the subject.
The KJV translators were biblically unqualified to write scripture. This is a statement of fact that you have yet to deal with. While you are at it, maybe you can go back to Hank's link to proof that the KJV translators were involved in persecuting Bible believing Christians. -
BTW, the textual choices for these questionable passages were the choices of men... the KJV translators. Proof has been posted that demonstrates that they were not qualifed to receive inspiration, were not theologically sound, and persecuted true believers.
Moreover, the idea that "some go against scripture" is also a "man's opinion"- yours. -
-
David and Moses were writers of scripture. The translators of the KJV were not. If the translators of the KJV had claimed that they received inspiration on a par with the original writers of scripture, then we would view their claims as heretical.
-
Anti-Alexandrian, are you arguing that the KJV translators DID receive inspiration?
-
-
-
-
"Victory" appears 38 times in the
Holman Chrsitian Standard BIble (HCSB).
"Victory" appear 12 times in
the KJB1769. Obviously HCSB is more concerned
with Victory than the KJB!
-
NIV Isaiah 14:12 How you have fallen from heaven,
O morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!
WHO is morning star?
NIV Rev. 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star."
Who is morning star?
NIV contradicts with 2 verses reflecting its interrogation: WHO is morning star?:
The Satan (Isa. 14:12) is as morning star as Jesus (Rev. 22:16). -
RaptureReady:Because if one is wrong, the hole thing is wrong. You either accept the italic words as scripture or you don't. I do.
So you're saying the AV translators wrote Scripture? After all, those words weren't in the sources they were translating. -
Askjo said "Me - misunderstand? That is not obvious"
Maybe not to you. ;)
Askjo said "NIV Isaiah 14:12 ... WHO is morning star?"
A Babylonian king, represented by the planet Venus.
Askjo said "NIV Rev. 22:16 ... Who is morning star?"
Do you mean who is "the bright Morning Star"? Jesus.
Askjo said "NIV contradicts with 2 verses reflecting its interrogation: WHO is morning star?"
No, no contradiction. Who said the title must be exclusive? For example, who is the "son of man"?
Askjo said "The Satan (Isa. 14:12) is as morning star as Jesus (Rev. 22:16)."
Why is it that only KJV-only people are confused about this?
Askjo said "Accusation without evidence? I already have some evidences about these men."
I haven't seen any, I may have missed it. Please feel free to post it again.
Page 13 of 15