NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
I have NEVER accussed you of grieving the Holy Spirit - that accusation has come form ONLY ONE direction. Let me see, if your statement is not the truth, that would make it a ...?
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Non-KJBO lies
- Thread starter RaptureReady
- Start date
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
Michelle also can determine who grieves the Holy Spirit and who doesn't.
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
I grieve the Holy Spirit even though I use the same Bible she does - go figger.
KJV translators of the High Commission Court (one an "archbishop") and King James atrocities:
HankD
http://www.tegart.com/brian/bible/kjvonly/rick/influence.html
HankD
Hank, I had just found the same article. Let's see if RR or Michelle actually have the courage and basic honesty to read the article and check the facts for themselves.
Do they really want to know the truth? Or, is it as we say- their own minds have become their final authority?
Do they really want to know the truth? Or, is it as we say- their own minds have become their final authority?
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
Guys, to quote michelle.
If you would just understand you would understand.
If you would just understand you would understand.
It's the same old story:
To KJVOnlies, the mostly Anglican translators of the KJV were saintly, wise scholars- and doctrinally sound in every regard. In contrast, the Anglicans Westcott & Hort were crazed, Satan-worshipping heretics.
As long as the character absolution or assassination suits their agenda....................
To KJVOnlies, the mostly Anglican translators of the KJV were saintly, wise scholars- and doctrinally sound in every regard. In contrast, the Anglicans Westcott & Hort were crazed, Satan-worshipping heretics.
As long as the character absolution or assassination suits their agenda....................
Though she has been harsh, we need to be gentle...
2 Timothy 2:24-26
And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all [men], apt to teach, patient,
In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
And [that] they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
HankD
2 Timothy 2:24-26
And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all [men], apt to teach, patient,
In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;
And [that] they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will.
HankD
You're right. But what we are witnessing now is the thing that is most frustrating. Michelle, RR, et al. will wait for a few pages before posting again in order to avoid responding.
I wouldn't normally make an accusation without concrete proof. However, it is a persistent pattern with KJVO's in general and Michelle in particular (and to the extreme). She backed herself into a corner. She can't refute what you posted so she will evade it. She won't substantiate her false charges against MV's so she claims to have already posted the proof and we are deaf, blind, and apparently stupid to have detected her obvious exposition of factual proof.
The sad thing is that Michelle and others engage in such a determined form of self-deception before they even getting around to public displays.
I wouldn't normally make an accusation without concrete proof. However, it is a persistent pattern with KJVO's in general and Michelle in particular (and to the extreme). She backed herself into a corner. She can't refute what you posted so she will evade it. She won't substantiate her false charges against MV's so she claims to have already posted the proof and we are deaf, blind, and apparently stupid to have detected her obvious exposition of factual proof.
The sad thing is that Michelle and others engage in such a determined form of self-deception before they even getting around to public displays.
And you are right as well Scott. You and I both (and others) have been the object of the wrath of michelle and other KJVO. Let's keep on answering them with truth.
My technique is show the KJVO folks that they come up short when measured with their own ruler.
HankD
My technique is show the KJVO folks that they come up short when measured with their own ruler.
HankD
With that said, 100 students sitting in a class, while one reads the of the King James Bible, inadvertently, no mistakes are made, because the other 99 students read from the same page. Amazing isn't it! </font>[/QUOTE]No, it's pickling the Bible in our language in the KJV.Originally posted by RaptureReady:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Orvie:
Sorry RR, it simply doesn't work that way. Over 98% of N.T. MSS are in agreement, no matter which Family of MSS are used. (the other 2% are non essentials, i.e. not vital doctrines)...imagine this: You have 100 students sitting in a class, while one reads the page of the N.T, several minor mistakes are made, one word slightly changed, or misspelled, or other minor variations...even if ALL 100 have one different mistake, you can still reconstruct the text by comparison. i.e. you don't need to be paranoid of valid M.V.'s!
The very translators of the KJV used a variety of MSS, multiple versions, etc. And BTW, which edition of the KJV do you mean? 1611? 1769? 1873? etc
Disagree! There is absolute confusion. I was a SS teacher using the KJV, but some members used their modern versions. They asked me why are they different. I explained why they are different because I realized this caused them confused when they looked up some verses that I gave them. Yes, the confusion!!!
Some go to the NIV church or NASB church or KJV church. I saw that many times.
Askjo, it took me a while to find what you were quoting. Turns out it was 12 pages, back on page 1.
My whole sentence was "I like using a different version than the pastor" and then I explained why.
But to answer your question, I don't recall ever using a gender neutral version, but I would like to buy one just for reference.
But to answer your question, I don't recall ever using a gender neutral version, but I would like to buy one just for reference.
Update? Mis-Information! They are updated to omit, add and change any words in MVs.
Accurate? These MVs are 1% accurate textual evidence.
updates to the KJV? Mis-Information! No, they did not.
poor translated? Him or it? Mis-Information! I heard that repeatedly. Will Kinney gave his comment in his website.
all reliable versions? Mis-Information! These MVs disagree each other, even that they and the KJV disagree each other.
Word? Mis-Information! Psalm 12:6-7 said God preserved His wordS
Charles Meadows
New Member
Askjo,
The KJB says "shalt preserve", not preserved. And the "them" in verse 7 is people and not words.
The KJB says "shalt preserve", not preserved. And the "them" in verse 7 is people and not words.