Omarosa says Trump is a racist who uses N-word – and claims there's tape to prove it

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by KenH, Aug 10, 2018.

  1. JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    33,630
    Likes Received:
    3,593
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yep.
     
  2. carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist
    NPR Host Calls Out Omarosa Over Discrepancy In Trump Racism Allegation


    NPR HOST CALLS OUT OMAROSA OVER DISCREPANCY IN TRUMP RACISM ALLEGATION


    In an interview Friday, former White House aide Omarosa Manigault Newman contradicted a claim in her forthcoming book that she heard a tape of President Trump using the “n-word.”

    Manigault Newman insisted in an NPR interview that she heard Trump utter the pejorative in an audio file recorded on the set of “The Apprentice.”

    “Hearing it changed everything for me,” Manigault Newman told NPR host Rachel Martin.

    “I heard the President of the United States use, not only the ‘n-word,’ but as Bill Pruitt described during that interview, other horrible things during the production of ‘The Apprentice,'” she continued. Pruitt is a former “Apprentice” producer who claimed before the 2016 election that tapes existed of Trump making racial comments about black people.


    But as Martin noted in the interview, Manigault Newman wrote in her book, “Unhinged,” that she was merely told of the tape. She does not suggest in the tell-all that she has actually heard Trump’s voice.

    In the book, due out Tuesday, Manigault Newman wrote that she spoke by phone about the tape to a person who she refuses to name.

    ________________________________________________________

    Long story short...Omarosa is a liar.
     
  3. Earth Wind and Fire Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    33,469
    Likes Received:
    1,576
    Faith:
    Baptist
    My, what a surprise :D
     
  4. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It is sad that Salty would refuse to give credence to lying gossip? Typical politics of destruction coming from the Socialist Left. :(
     
  5. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you would discriminate against all non-Christians applying for secular employment? I thought you were a champion of civil rights!
     
  6. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Someone with a history of drug abuse, alcoholism, or sexual abuse, etc., and haven’t cleaned up their act? You betcha.
     
  7. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So you are admitting you would discriminate against non-Christians thus violating their civil rights?
     
  8. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I wouldn't hire someone with that background of drug abuse, etc., regardless of their religious beliefs or lack thereof. Would you?
     
  9. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    More deflection. The subject is not drug abuse alcoholism or sexual abuse. The subject which YOU framed was "repentance" of past sins.
     
  10. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    More deflection. You framed the discussion as "repentance" from past sins. Then, when called on your bigoted denial of basic civil rights you ran and hid behind your constant deflection.
     
  11. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    If someone has cleaned up their act, then obviously they have turned from those activities and gone forward in a different direction.
     
  12. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    But that is not what you said. More deflection.
     
  13. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Then what DID I say? Or maybe what did you THINK I said?
     
  14. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You said: (post 12)
    The topic under discussion was having used language which included the "n" word 5 or 10 years ago.

    Then you said: (Post 17)
    You assert that repentance is required before you would hire the person. And you added, as more deflection "alcoholism or drug abuse" which was never part of the discussion.

    Then Salty said:
    As do all the rest of us, but you continue to deflect.
     
  15. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Sorry, but I am lost as a ball in high weeds as to what you don't understand about what I have written in this thread. I don't think any reputable business would hire someone if their background check turned up awful language having been used, say on Twitter or Facebook, and they did not show that they have cleaned up their act.
     
  16. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    1. There is no evidence President Trump used the "n" word years ago when still on TV. Only gossip.

    2. The woman who claims he used the "n" word wrote in her book that she was not present but somebody who was present told her he used the word.

    3. The person in question came forward and said he never told her any such thing and that he never heard President Trump use that word.

    4. The women then changed her story and tried to say she heard him in person say it even though she had previously admitted she was not present.

    5. As the preponderance of the evidence shows that the report is gossip and untrue, there is nothing regarding that issue to clean up his act about.

    So, are you a gossip monger or a man of integrity?
     
  17. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I never said Trump used the word, but considering the language he has used in the past, even as president, it would not surpise me if he has. I suggest you contact Omarosa and discuss your cocnerns with her since you are worked up over her allegation.
     
  18. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Ken, please. You titled the thread "Omarosa says Trump is a racist who uses N-word – and claims there's tape to prove it."

    Then you have spent the last three pages trying to defend your posting the link:
     
  19. KenH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2002
    Messages:
    42,067
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Nope. I used the title race on the website. I suggest you contact the website and discuss it with them since you are so worked up about it.
     
  20. TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,490
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So now you are saying that the link you posted leads only to lying slander and is without factual support?