If clothing isn't important, why wear any at all?
I'll agree with the bunch that the place reflects the type of clothing worn. I have gone to a singing school every year since I was born. We have morning devotionals and evening devotionals where the speaker (usually an elder) wears slacks and a button-up shirt, usually short-sleeved, no tie, sometimes tennis shoes and sometimes dress shoes. It takes place outside in the middle of June. HOT!!!
But, when we go to church in an actual church, it is suit and tie for about 99% of the preachers with the others wearing nice polo style shirts.
It may be wrong, but it would be hard for me to listen attentively to a man preaching from the pulpit wearing a Hawaiian shirt. Doesn't he know that it is so off-the-wall that it will distract from the message?
If we're just using the term "modest" to describe our dress for church, well we need to determine what it means. From the posts I'm reading here, it appears that modest means anything that covers the body. Well, how about a speedo. What if the pastor wore make-up into the pulpit? What if he didn't shave for a month, didn't bathe for a while, and didn't comb his hair or even wash his clothes. Would that be alright?
I'm sorry, but I'm just not buying the whole "as long as he's comfortable" thing. I just can't imagine that a pastor would place his determination to wear non-dress clothing over the comfort of his congregation. If the man owns a suit, and he intentionally wears something considered inappropriate in most churches, then it seems that he is just trying to stir trouble. That is wrong.
And, like it or not, we as human beings judge others based on their outward appearance, whether you want to admit it or not. It's hard to respect someone when they don't show the same respect back, even if it is just in the way they dress. Imagine wearing a Hawaiian shirt to a job interview...anywhere but Hawaii.
What if the pastor came dressed as a punk rocker. As long as he's fully clothed, I guess it wouldn't matter what he wore or how he looked, right? What if he dyed his hair pink, and purple, and green. Shaved it into a mohawk. Rode a motorcycle in the church to the pulpit. As long as he's modest. After all, the bible doesn't say you can't ride a motorcyce in the church.
Bottom line, if it's going to distract the congregation from the message, it shouldn't be worn or done, whether it be wearing a Hawaiian shirt or an orange tuxedo or whatever else.
We have enough respect for the dead to wear a suit to a funeral, but all of a sudden we don't have respect enough for God, His church, and His followers to wear the same to church?
I still ask, did any of our church fathers advocate dressing down for church? Did ministers 50 or 100 yrs. ago wear Hawaiian shirts to church?
Scripture doesn't forbid dressing down, but what does tradition tell us? I reiterate that tradition is important. Throughout the history of the church things have been allowed which were not in and of themselves against scripture, but just look at all of the unscriptural things that have crept in just by allowing little things in the church. If we don't allow the little things, we won't have to worry about the big things.