tinytim
<img src =/tim2.jpg>
Joined:
Oct 31, 2003
Messages:
11,250
Likes Received:
0
Absolutely... finally we agree about something....
Are you willing to apply this to the other things you condemn?
Joined:
Dec 1, 2006
Messages:
811
Likes Received:
0
I don't remember condemning anything, but yes, the only exception being that which applies to worship.
tinytim
<img src =/tim2.jpg>
Joined:
Oct 31, 2003
Messages:
11,250
Likes Received:
0
what about missions?
why? why worship?
Joined:
Dec 1, 2006
Messages:
811
Likes Received:
0
We already talked about missions pretty thoroughly, and if you want to talk about the regulative principle of worship why not start a new thread?
I think it is a worthwhile subject and will try to contribute something.
It is something few believers think much about.
Joined:
Jan 16, 2006
Messages:
11,103
Likes Received:
0
I think Tim's point is that your statement...
Is contradicted by other statements you've made regarding missions, church structure and polity, and yes, worship as well.
Yours is an inconsistent view.
Joined:
Dec 1, 2006
Messages:
811
Likes Received:
0
rbell said:
I think Tim's point is that your statement...
Is contradicted by other statements you've made regarding missions, church structure and polity, and yes, worship as well.
Yours is an inconsistent view.
Click to expand...
I don't think so.
Post question on regulative principle.
You might understand the position better if you do that.
Site Supporter
Joined:
Sep 4, 2000
Messages:
20,253
Likes Received:
1,381
Faith:
Baptist
I think John of Japan gave a good answer (as usual). I would add that Christian, monogamistic husbands be sought for the other "wives".
In regard to the "debate" over ploygamy: How many wives did God make for Adam?