Where do you find a Bible basis for Christians fighting for political freedom?
I believe in the sufficiency of Scripture, but traditionally the Bible addresses how people act specifically within the church and in principles outside the church. So, for instance, the Bible clearly gives all you need to do to worship God. We should not do anything other than what God commands. However, God does not deal with specifically how I am to act at my work. He, though, gives principles and standards of conduct. Thus, at work I fight for these principles in my company.
So, I would say that while there is no one fighting in the governmental structure in the New Testament. There is no one who is fighting for a just company in the New Testament. Yet, there are principles that if you have certain authority, you should fight try to uphold. Writing our public officials, voting, making our voice heard, and keeping our officials accountable may not ever be explicitly in the Bible, there are certainly principles that govern those acts.
I don't understand the relationship between being created in God's image and being promised life. Christians have been martyred all through history.
From the beginning, because we were created in God's image guarantees us that murder is wrong because we should have the right to life. Yes, there are times in history where people were martyred, but in God's just society life is a right and denying that right is in violation of the 6th commandment, because we were created in God's image.
Our liberty is only in Christ. That exists no matter what the political climate. This has no connexion to political liberty.
I disagree. Theologians throughout history have acknowledged that man, because of the creation covenant and are created in God's image, we are both under certain law but are protected by certain law. Life, God secured by condemning murder through his law. His law was given so we can be more happy, and God clearly defined the roles of governing authorities to clearly give us Liberty. I think a non-Christian has Liberty to marry. I think a non-Christian has Liberty to believe what he wants to believe. I think a non-Christian has Liberty to purchase property and to raise his family in how he wants. Yes, I believe governments have, at times, abridged such Liberties, but they are liberties granted by God to all people.
'Joy unspeakable and full of glory' comes in serving God no matter what our circumstances. Often through history God has been glorified through the worst of persecutions. For an example might I suggest you look up the Edict of Toleration of 311 of which Will Durant writes, '"There is no greater drama in human record than the sight of a few Christians, scorned or oppressed by a succession of emperors, bearing all trials with a fierce tenacity, multiplying quietly, building order while their enemies generated chaos, fighting the sword with the word, brutality with hope, and at last defeating the strongest state that history has known. Caesar and Christ had met in the arena, and Christ had won.'
I agree, there have been times when God has used persecution to glorify himself. Yet, in this thread, I have been talking about an apparent step to the abridgment of those rights. I agree, martyrdom has been used as a glorious tool for God. However, we should not wish upon martyrdom and if we have the ability, should stay martyrdom. We should desire peace with all men, including our leaders. As well, as a Christian I should desire to worship God in peace. If I am able to help foster that peace with endorsing policies that would encourage peace, I will.
The idea of 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness' is a result of 18th century rationalism. It is not a Bible based concept. We have become so used to being spoiled believers that we forget that only a tiny minority of the church has ever lived under a government which protects them. The norm in oppression, opposition, and persecution.
I do not think we are spoiled, I think we do believe this is how best a government should operate. Happiness is actually pre-rationalism. The puritans were adamant in our happiness and in the enjoyment of life.
Why do we expect favor when the Bible tells is that 'those who live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution?'
Yes, people will be persecuted, that is descriptive. That does not mean we should seek persecution and give up saying that persecution is inevitable. We should not give up, but we should be willing to do what we can to ensure peace. What is wrong with that. I almost think you are disappointed that we are not being martyred.