You must think folks are stupid, you are 100% in the sack with Obama. The only person you are fooling is yourself.
Presidential Debate Comments
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Revmitchell, Oct 22, 2012.
Page 4 of 6
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I believe this debate will have a big effect in Romney's favor.
-
I noted earlier I thought that the debate was boring. I believe i am like Krauthammer, i would have liked to see a little more "in your face". It seems that Obama attempted to do that but Romney controlled the tenor of the debate. Krauthammer indicated he thought that was the goal of Romney and that he impressed people as being presidential in doing that.
Chris Wallace said earlier he had contacted a Romney operative and was told that was the Romney strategy. -
CNN poll has Obama winning. Just sayin.
-
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Charles Krauthammer on the Third Presidential Debate: “It’s Unequivocal Mitt Romney W
Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer reacted to the third presidential debate at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida. He said, “I think it’s unequivocal Mitt Romney won.”
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/10/2...ntial-debate-its-unequivocal-mitt-romney-won/ -
That made him look weak. -
-
-
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I found I could watch the debate on C-Span this morning. I must say the split screen worked against Romney. When not speaking he look uncomfortable, unsure and not confident. One of the responses in this thread spoke to this.
I was amazed how he moved away from his hawkish statement toward the middle, if not a pacifistic position, with his statement on "We cannot kill our way out of this mess." Then he denied making some of the hawkish statements. It is astounding how he can deny making statement that he made to win right-wing voters.
Both men made some mistakes, but it is hard to be prefect, even in a debate.
It was pretty obvious that Romney wanted to steer the debate away from foreign policy as he kept trying to bring the debate back to issues covered in the 2nd debate.
-
Has to be some kind of record. 8 pages devoted to a two bit freak show.
"Na na na na na my freak is better than your freak!" "Oh no he ain't my freak is better than your freak!"
God help us. Because neither of these freaks will. -
Crabtownboy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
As I have said before, there is no way to know which Romney you are voting for as he continues to contradict previous statements.
-
That might all be true about Romney like you say Crabby I'm not arguing with you about Romney. I don't trust him at all. We sure don't have the same problem with Obama though do we? No we don't because he has proven time and again that he is a pathological liar. We know exactly where he is coming from.
Is that what we need in a president?
Neither of these guys are fit to lead this nation but c'mon get real the last thing this county needs is another four years of lies and deception from a guy we already know to be a liar and deceiver.
On the one hand we got a known chicken hawk liar that's been arming our enemies and on the other we got a chicken hawk draft dodger promising to arm our enemies better than the chicken hawk liar he's trying to defeat in a sham s-election.
I have to ask this . . . are you people insane? Seriously what in the world ails you all?
After asking that I just realized what's missing in all these debates. SANITY!
It's no wonder the democrats and republicans conspired together to keep Gary Johnson out these debates. They last thing they want Americans seeing is just how similar and insane these two criminal parties really are. -
Me believes "O" would LOVE to skipper the Abraham Lincoln!!!!!! He'd run it aground just like he has the nation he "Skippers":type::type: -
InTheLight Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
This might sound strange--I think Obama won the debate but I think Romney will benefit the most.
As commander in chief Obama was in command of the facts (as he sees them.) Romney was much too agreeable only differing with Obama on a few future policies--arming the Syrian rebels and tightening the sanctions on Iran. He said "I agree with the President" at least three times. Romney failed to question Obama further on Benghazi. Obama challenged Romney several times and had Romney on his heels. So in this sense Romney lost the debate.
However, Romney showed undecided voters that he wasn't the trigger happy candidate that Obama has been trying to portray him as. Romney used the word 'peace' at least a half dozen times and (I think) three times in his closing statement. Romney's best line was when he told the President "we can't kill our way to success" in hostile Muslim nations. I think undecided voters who were wondering about Romney's chops as a commander in chief were placated. So in this sense Romney gets the bigger benefit from this debate.
All that said, I don't think the polls will move at all. Possibly Romney picks up a sliver more of support. -
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
His arrogance and condescension means he had no real substance and therefore loses. -
The depths of some people's bitterness toward that man. Bitterness that folks don't let go of will turn to hate.
It's kinda difficult to out punch an incumbent President on foreign policy when you don't have the experience. With all the agreeing he did, he made Obama look , oddly enough, Presidential in the decisions he had made.
Romney needs women voters. But women vote safety and security. And last night Romney made it look like the President was doing a very good job in that area. -
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Page 4 of 6