My dear brother, what makes you think any of us "MVers" want to correct Him? What any of us here want to do is to correct the errors of men (translators, printers, etc) which have found their way into the English text.
Don't you realize that your statement is one which possibly bears a false witness (although by innuendo) against others?
As you know God is incapable of making the smallest error. To say that the errors in the KJV "are just typos" (some indeed are not and are translation errors) doesn't negate this fact that God is incapable of any kind of error.
The KJV translation committee was not ashamed to deal with the different kinds of human errors in the AV and issued their first revision in 1613 and then in 1629, 1638, 1744, 1762, and 1769. They realized the fact of these historically evidenced human errors by publicly correcting their work.
The problem is not with the KJV which many of us use exclusively, but with the claims made by certain beloved brethren who are pious but ill-informed folks.
To say that the KJV is the "perfect" or "pure" Word(s) of God in the sense of the statement of Jesus concerning the "jots" and "tittles" (of which the KJV contains none) is confusing considering the several hundred years of corrections of the several hundreds of human errors in the KJV.
It therefor also has the potential of being an afront to God because even if these errors were all "typos" it says by implication that God doesn't make any big mistakes only little ones like "typos" (or at very least it says that little errors are OK with Him).
HankD
