Consider where we would be if the Canon of Dordrecht didn't take place and condemn Arminianism as false teaching. True Arminianism is false teaching, and was developed as a reaction against Sovereignty and for mans inability. Just ponder that for a few seconds. In this we "reformed" consider what's at stake with this errant theology and address it.
What would happen if we didn't have the false teachings of Pelagius condemned at Carthage? Men of God have stood up to defend the faith, as Paul, Jude, Peter, the other Apostles, who addressed false teachings as those above and were set to defend truth. Were they well liked? Absolutely not, but who cares, I love men like these who are in the heat of the battle.
Now, can these things be addressed on here without the pejorative attitude attacking those who expose these false teachings with real evidence? I don't know, but I seriously doubt they can going by the track record.
I do know this, that whenever a thread is started to discuss the errant theologies of these camps, the typical response by those within the camps is not to address the documented evidence but rather to attack the person with ridicule and name calling without ever addressing the teachings defined.
One more thing, when an anti-cal thread is began with subjective unfactual findings, these same go in to these with nothing to offer theologically, but with the same ridicule slung at "reformed" brothers.
Anyhow, thankfully men of God stood up for truth to defend the faith once delivered to the Saints. We have in Scripture "the unity of the faith" not "the unity of the faiths." We're not building Babel, we're building the Kingdom of God, thus the battle for truth against said errors.
Now, I would like to get some findings in line with the OP from others and what they do.
- Peace