Rejected Jn 3:16 Super Bowl Ad

[Arbo]

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/John-316-Super-Bowl-Ad-Rejected-3119

Apparently it's too controversial.

 

[annsni]

That is really one offensive commercial. I can't believe they were going to post that!! I'm glad they are going to go with the soft porn GoDaddy commercials instead.

Massive sarcasm there, huh??

Unbelievable.

 

[Arbo]

...And if they had a "wardrobe malfunction" it'd be on the air for sure.

 

[preachinjesus]

They're rejecting just about everything this year. For some of the ads they get more notice if they are rejected.

 

[texasgal]

That was rather offensive, I'm glad it wasn't posted !!

 

[annsni]

Yeah, the commercials they showed were SOOOO much less offensive than that!! :BangHead:

 

[David Lamb]

Yeah, the commercials they showed were SOOOO much less offensive than that!! :BangHead:

Yes, didn't they have one with Simon Cowell?

 

[annsni]

Yes, didn't they have one with Simon Cowell?

I don't know - I didn't watch all of them. I cleaned instead of watching the game. LOL

 

[Earth Wind and Fire]

I don't know - I didn't watch all of them. I cleaned instead of watching the game. LOL

So you didnt see ARod being fed popcorn by that girlfriend Actress "Whats Her Face?

Makes bing a Yankee Fan mighty hard to do!

 

[Aaron]

The Gospel doesn't sell, folks.

 

[annsni]

So you didnt see ARod being fed popcorn by that girlfriend Actress "Whats Her Face?

Makes bing a Yankee Fan mighty hard to do!

Nope - missed it, thank goodness.

 

[David Lamb]

I don't know - I didn't watch all of them. I cleaned instead of watching the game. LOL

The fact and the immense cost of the Simon Cowell advert even made it on to the BBC TV news the following day, though the actual game didn't!