Well, isn't this interesting. People can call Obama or others they consider 'liberal' all kinds of names, negative ones of course. But if a person gives a link to a news article that shows a Republican or conservative in a bad light they are to be condemned.
Now, be as considerate to Obama as you want others to be with this lady. OK?
What a silly non-point.
So...you can't call Obama "liberal?" Even though he is for a massive increase in government power and influence...and even though he is taking unprecedented action with regards to what the federal government is doing? Even though he is undertaking action that the US COnstitution does not allow? You can't call him "liberal," because that's "Bad?"
What a logically vapid line of reasoning. Is that the best you can do?
Of course, I did say her comment was stupid...but since that didn't help your cause (that being of painting Republicans as being backward racist hatemongering inbred brainless mouth-breathers), you conveniently ignored that.
See, here's your problem: You
lie in your posts. Now...let's take someone like MP, with whom I often disagree. He's at least honest. And though we'll often disagree, there's potential, at times, for some form of common ground. But you're not honest with many of your posts. And when someone's not honest, any line of fruitful debate is unlikely.