Retribultion Theology

Martin,
Throughout the threads, much Scripture has been discussed.

Your “detailed analysis” and “relevant texts” were systematically refuted.

Now attempting to pin the rejection of penal substitution as disregard of Scripture is just inconsistent with the work of these threads.

I am too, like JonC, am confronted with the truth of Scripture not fitting with preconceived and long taught views.

This is not the only issue that needs modification or even discarding.

All one can seek is to lay before the B.B. that which is held and the rationale with a Scripture support. If such is worthy, then perchance others may benefit.

It is not unreasonable to find great push back when something such as PST is discarded, yet there is hope that at least some awareness of another view is seen.

But if folks truly held to sola Scripture, they would all agree that not a single Scripture appoints God as pouring out wrath upon the Son.