Rosen returns to TV to defend attack on Ann Romney

Mothers are to be highly respected, but they usually don't get the respect they truly deserve, something I find very disturbing and unsettling.
Being a mother is a lot harder than many of the jobs most people work at, and politicians should take careful note of that, and either praise mothers, or keep their trap on safety so as not to act out a "Rosan".

 

Why does she need to show that she has social security earnings?

What possible difference does it make?

Obama never had a real job either.

Community organizer?

Puh-leeeeeze.

Rosen's silly rant was an attempt to slander Mrs. Romney.

Too bad for Obama and the Democrats that there are so many mothers who take offense to their silly notion that you can't understand the "struggles of ordinary people" unless you have held a 9 to 5 job.

Does Mrs. Obama act as though she understands with all of her taxpayer paid junkets to whatever luxury vacation resort she has a whim to visit? With her frivolous shopping trips? With chefs flown into the Whitehouse to make pizza?

The list is endless.

 

Bill, you've unwittingly demonstrated the liberal war on women. "Work" isn't valid unless you've paid into the socialist Social Security fund; and thus, "mothers"--whether they gave birth or adopted--who choose to focus their efforts on their children, rather than pay others to do so, have less stature than those who choose to indoctrinate their children with the concept that "mother's *real* job comes before you."

 

BINGO!
​

And if the common sense people of this nation don't see thru this ruse real quick, and make the true issues foremost in the public eye, then we're in for another 4 ye---- er, uh, unlimited reign of his majesty King Zero!!

 

The Obama's Have a Live in Nanny....

...in the form of the mother-in-law, taking care of the children! So, does this sentiment carry over to the Obama's, Billwald???

 

Anyone think MS Romney changed many diapers and did the laundry?

 

I Guess I'd have to ask....

...how many diapers and loads of laundry have you PERSONALLY done in your life time?

Again, you have'nt responded to the fact that the Obama's brought Michelles mom to the WH to take care of the kids. Is this any different than the Romneys?

I don't see too much of a gap between the two of them (Obama's and Romney). :thumbs:

 

Again....

.....just how low are you planning to go with your point?

My mom, and tons of other baby-boomer moms, probably didn't have a SSN to show for, that is why they are permitted to piggyback on their husbands social Security.

 

Oops.... you just stepped into it.

You are now saying that a woman can't relate to the daily struggles of the "ordinary person" unless she changes her babies diapers.

But Democrats encourage women to not have babies.

And I postulate that it is Democrat women that have the lion's share of the abortions.

So it only follows by Democrat logic that Demorat women should not be allowed to vote or run for office.

And as an extension of Rosen's arguement that Romney is not qualified because his wife "never worked a day in her life" - men that are married to Democrat women should not be allowed to run for office either.

Do you see where what passes for logic in your world gets you?

 

>You are now saying that a woman can't relate to the daily struggles of the "ordinary person" unless she changes her babies diapers.

Not exactly. I'm saying that many women consider raising children a pleasure and that many men and women define "work" as something one does for a paycheck. Many people do things on their own time which is more tiring and more difficult than their "regular" job but they call it fun, nor work.

 

So when you said, "Anyone think MS Romney changed many diapers and did the laundry?" - that meant - "...many women consider raising children a pleasure ..."?

You aren't kidding anyone.

 

bill hates women. Not the ones he sees on calendars. He hates real women. That's why he hated Palin. That's why he hates Ann.

And let's not forget that bill is getting a hefty check for no work right now. He is getting paid for doing nothing. That's why he loves the Democrats, and they're getting their money's worth out of him.

 

Well, I Disagree with that TOO....

...I have to admit, that I must have been different than some, because I had several jobs that I actually felt guilty about getting a paycheck from.

Those jobs were a "pleasure" to have, and I thoroughly enjoyed each and every day spent at them.

I always felt that if I only did what I did for a paycheck, that it wasn't what I really wanted to do. And that is why I praise God. He always opened doors for me in the career field, because I can honestly tell you that there were very few days that hated or dreaded going to a job.

 

I never wanted to be a police officer. I applied because I was laid off at Boeing and most any job is better than no job. It was a fun job 45 years ago. These days I am glad that none of my kids or grand kids are local police work. Not even for $65K starting pay.

 

and this is just another example of the arrogance and smugness many of these "progressives" do not se that they have.

 

Amen, Roger!!!

That is exactly why she will be ceaselessly attacked by liberals in the coming months.

 

Who cares?:sleep: