1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Senators introduce law to ban 'crush' videos of animal cruelty

Discussion in 'News & Current Events' started by FR7 Baptist, Sep 28, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Top Posters
Page 2 of 2
  1. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you vote for a politician that suppports a right to cruelty to animals if they are in line with your other political beliefs as you do for politicians that support a right to abortion?

    Same question - but change to support federal funding of animal cruelty.
     
    #21 targus, Sep 28, 2010
  2. FR7 Baptist

    FR7 Baptist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yes, if there weren't any anti-animal cruelty candidates in the Democratic primary.

    See above.

    Look Targus, I changed it.
     
    #22 FR7 Baptist, Sep 28, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 28, 2010
  3. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    Intesting value system...

    Voting for a Demoncrat is more important than voting against animal cruelty.

    Voting for a Demoncrat is more important than voting against abortion.

    For you what it's all about is voting for Demoncrats first - above any other consideration.
     
    #23 targus, Sep 28, 2010
  4. FR7 Baptist

    FR7 Baptist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, I'd consider voting for a pro-life, anti-animal cruelty Socialist Party candidate instead of a Democrat who supports abortion and animal cruelty.
     
    #24 FR7 Baptist, Sep 28, 2010
  5. matt wade

    matt wade Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,156
    Likes Received:
    78
    You just need to remember that he wants to be a lawyer!

    (oh, and that he was top of his gifted class in middle school)
     
    #25 matt wade, Sep 28, 2010
  6. targus

    targus New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    8,459
    Likes Received:
    0
    No you already answered "Yes, if there weren't any anti-animal cruelty candidates in the Democratic primary."

    It's too late to change it now.

    It's already out there in cyberspace for everyone to see. :tongue3:
     
    #26 targus, Sep 28, 2010
  7. FR7 Baptist

    FR7 Baptist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    I only boycott Republicans. I have no problem voting Socialist if the Democratic candidate sucks.
     
    #27 FR7 Baptist, Sep 28, 2010
  8. lori4dogs

    lori4dogs New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    Only consider! I would vote for anyone else rather than vote for someone who supports abortion and animal cruelty.
     
    #28 lori4dogs, Sep 29, 2010
  9. FR7 Baptist

    FR7 Baptist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,378
    Likes Received:
    1
    You can't always get everything you want in a candidate. Back on topic- What do you think about this bill?
     
    #29 FR7 Baptist, Sep 29, 2010
  10. lori4dogs

    lori4dogs New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,429
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think it is a waste of time, effort and money. As Christians, we must support justice whenever the opportunity is present. This is an honorable, just bill and is the right thing to do. If you don't stand up for justice in the 'lesser' issues, I don't think you are all that likely to take a stand for the bigger ones, IMHO.
     
    #30 lori4dogs, Sep 29, 2010
  11. jaigner

    jaigner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow. That was faster than I thought.

    Seriously, maybe we shouldn't do either.
     
    #31 jaigner, Sep 29, 2010
  12. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    I think we're talking about two different but similar things. There's no reason to not address one because of the other, IMO. Anyone who gets kicks from this sort of thing has a screw loose and needs some serious help. As a dwarf bunny owner, I think it's so disgusting and I would hope that something so demented WOULD be addressed by the law. It in no way diminishes my staunch pro-life stance either.
     
    #32 annsni, Sep 30, 2010
  13. Steven2006

    Steven2006 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    0
    :applause: Exactly how I feel, is is narrow minded to believe our government should only address one issue and discard others.
     
    #33 Steven2006, Sep 30, 2010
Page 2 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...