1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Temporary Salvationist 1-8

Discussion in '2006 Archive' started by Herb Evans, Nov 17, 2006.

  1. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    These are two very separate doctrines BTW. It should properly read, "They are invented doctrines" My previous post dealt with the plain scripture that says certain behavior can cause us to miss the kingdom. I agree with Brother (other) Evans that we cannot lose our salvation.

    lacy
     
  2. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    I Can never quite understand folks that believe that kingdom entrance is more important that eternal salvation entrance. Kingdom exclusion is an invented doctrine, Christians in hell fire is an invented doctrine. -- Herb Evans
     
  3. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Unfortunately you have not read the complete Newman/Evans debate or you would know that I went over this. I also went ovver this with your Faustite Pope, Joey. I am not doing it again. From what you have posted, I don't think that you would bring any continuity to the debate in point/counterpoint fashion. Jim managed to do a pretty good job at that as well as Mike. I am not into this hit, run, and hide and jump around and pick and choose method of debating. Sorry! You are in over your head, Lacy! -- Herb Evans
     
  4. Mike Berzins

    Mike Berzins New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  5. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dr. Evans,

    In viewing this thread, I have done my best to objectively listen to your arguments and to reserve judgment. However, I am consistently distracted by your ability to work your way out of clear scripture and your ability to disparage brothers when you lack substantive argument. Further, your desire to criticize a brother and his doctrines while lacking the courage to face that brother in the way of a man, suggests a very cowardly, effeminate spirit and don't go trying to sell me your silly $5 cd. Your heretic argument doesn't wash as based on that argument you shouldn't be talking to James, Lacy, Jump, or anyone else that believes in kingdom accountability, and while it may be news to you, Joey Faust is not the only one preaching this doctrine, past or present, so there's a whole lot of heretics out there for you to disfellowship from. I expect you won't be responding to this post as you already know that according to your belief system, I am a heretic. As to your pope comment, I know of the pope and I know of Joey Faust and there is nothing similar about these individuals nor of the offices each of these men hold. There's a bad spirit that has a hold of you regarding this topic and I pray you shake free and repent before you do, in fact, face Jesus Christ on judgment day.

    By the way, did the following words have meaning or are they similar to your other words?

     
  6. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    duplicate deleted
     
    #226 Herb Evans, Dec 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2006
  7. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
     
    #227 Herb Evans, Dec 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2006
  8. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    continued



    Well, here we go mixing and matching scriptures to arrive at a false conclusion, a favorite past time of Faustites. You are saying that only being killed at the JSOC and hell fire can bring terror there. That is not in the passage. You pontificate what the terror is and and what causes the terror. But for anyone to know the unrecorded terror of the Lord at the JSOC without ever being there is a bit much to ask us to believe. --Herb Evans



    If Paul knew what it was and it is what Faustites teach, where is it defined? Or do you just interpolate it into the passage? Did Paul say what the terror was or what caused it, or do you do that for him? -- Herb Evans



    Are you giving me scripture here or are you resorting to human reasoning and logic? Just But there is terror in the land of the living as well. I believe Paul is talking about terror in the land of the living, but if it is terror at the JSOC, standing in the presence of the Lord is terror enough. No mike, picking out a word from scripture an assigning your own false doctrine to it will not cut the mustard. Faustite manipulation into some kind of formula will not work either.

    Lev. 26:16 I also will do this unto you; I will even appoint over you terror, consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.

    Deu 34:12 And in all that mighty hand, and in all the great terror which Moses shewed in the sight of all Israel.

    Job 6:4 For the arrows of the Almighty are within me, the poison whereof drinketh up my spirit: the terrors of God do set themselves in array against me.

    Psa 55:4 My heart is sore pained within me: and the terrors of death are fallen upon me.

    Eze 32:32 For I have caused my terror in the land of the living:
    Herb Evans
     
  9. Herb Evans

    Herb Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    You are entitled to your opinion. If it satisfies you to make Herb Evans the issue as opposed to the issue itself, that is your problem. Believe whatever heresy that you want; it is a free country. I can't sacrifice substance in order to answerr silly posts about myself. -- Herb Evans
     
    #229 Herb Evans, Dec 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2006
  10. Ed Edwards

    Ed Edwards <img src=/Ed.gif>

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2002
    Messages:
    15,715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rufus_1611: //By the way, did the following words have meaning or are they similar to your other words?//

    Thank you for looking up these quotes Brother Rufus_1611.
    Can you spell DRAMA QUEEN there Bro. Rufus?

    Thank you for looking up these quotes Brother Rufus_1611.
    I find it interesting that you found three.
    I suspect that a certain party is strained to learn
    that God has three kingdoms.
    (A Triune God with three kingdoms -- who would of thoght
    it?)

    1. The Kingdom of God among us saved now: the Holy Spirit within us

    2. The physical Millinnial Messanic Kingdom of God

    3. The eternal Kingdom of God - oneness with the Godhead
     
    #230 Ed Edwards, Dec 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2006
  11. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. That freaks me out too.

    Eternal salvation is the cake. The Kingdom is the icing. We are commanded to seek the icing! We already have the cake. So it's not a matter of priority with me. I don't get the free gift (that I already have) mixed up with the prize (that I am commanded to win.)

    Lacy

    PS. I don't need your CD. I was there recieving all the e-mails as they happened and I have a hard copy. I have also read (as far as I know) everything you have written on the subject and published on the net. And you do the same thing here (In moderation:laugh: :laugh: ) that you did then. When cornered by the book, you go subjective and start with the name calling. Same MO as always. All powder and no cannon balls! BOOM!

    If you bothered to read the threads that I provided, you would see that I have debated this from practically every angle imaginable, before you ever showed up here. I am not one to boast but I'm just giving you your own medicine. (Without calling you a heretic.) I'm not really interested in whatever it is you call point/counterpoint until you repent of the subjective, silly name calling. I know where it always ends. I held back for a long time to see if you had grown in the last few years. Doesn't seem so.

    'till the next BOOM!
     
    #231 Lacy Evans, Dec 12, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 12, 2006
  12. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you had any idea how big my head is, (8 1/2):love2: you might rethink that.

    Lacy
     
  13. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you would focus on the issue itself, rather than calling people names then there wouldn't be a problem. I loathe being called a Ruckmanite because I believe in the Authorized Version of the Bible and I loathe being called a Faustite because I believe in kingdom accountability. These are the tactics of the simple-minded who find their arguments to be insufficient.
     
  14. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're welcome Brother Ed.

    D R A M A Q U E E N. Now what's your point? Dude said three times he was bailing from this thread. Now I don't care that he does, he can stick around but why say something and not do it? Can you spell liar brother Ed?

    You're welcome again Brother Ed.

    I suspect that a certain party is strained to learn how to spell thought, millenial or messianic.
     
  15. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    The context has always been the judgment seat of Christ. You are the one trying to force some new man/old man dichotomy into the text. There is one man being judged, and one man being rewarded.

    1Co 3:14-17
    14 If any man's work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.
    15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.
    16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?
    17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

    It was the judgment seat of Christ in verse 14, it was the judgment seat of Christ in verse 15 and it is still the judgment seat of Christ in verse 17. Throwing new man/old man into the equation doesn't change the clear context which is the trying of a teachers works at the judgment seat of Christ, when every man's work shall be made manifest.

    It means to cause your brother to be destroyed by following your example.

    Rom 14:23 And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.

    What does Paul mean by damned? Whatever that means, that is what he means by destroyed.

     
  16. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0

    Thou shalt be nice to Brother Ed. I think he was actually agreeing with you and not opposing you.

    lacy
     
  17. Blammo

    Blammo New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    And yet you were perfectly aware of the words he misspelled. Sew wye not respawnd to wut he sed insted of how he spelt it?
     
  18. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ooohhhh. That makes sense now. My apologies to Brother Ed.
     
  19. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was only pointing out spelling errors in a rebutal to believing I was being asked to spell drama queen and thought I was in a spelling contest all of a sudden. I stand by my comments to Dr. evans and retract my comments to Ed and I will now go back to being an observer of this thread.
     
  20. Blammo

    Blammo New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see. I apologize. I should go back to being an observer of EVERY thread seeing how I can't seem to keep my foot out of my mouth lately.
     
Loading...