1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Textbook Misleading Many Seminary and Bible College Students

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Revmitchell, May 22, 2014.

  1. Greektim

    Greektim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    138
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm a huge fan of Sailhamer's views of Gen. 1-2. Here is a good synopsis of the book and his view. http://www.desiringgod.org/articles/science-the-bible-and-the-promised-land

    The biblical theological value of his view is outstanding.
     
  2. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Think that this issue, while indeed important, is NOT a primary issue, as long as he still upholds the essentials of the Christian faith, so would tend to see him as one who has accepted current modern thinking on Genesis/dating to some degree, but that overall his theology text still valuable!

    is he now a theistic Evolutionists than?
     
  3. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    1
    No he is not TE. He accepts the label Historical Creationist. Although I am much more TE, he has some interesting developed positions regarding "eretz' (the land). He suggests that our translation of "the heavens and the earth" is misunderstood and should be understood in terms of the "land" prepared for man. So far in my reading he does not commit to an OE, but seems to accept that possibility

    Might be worthwhile to see a list of what you consider essentials for you to accept someone as a believer.
     
  4. evangelist6589

    evangelist6589 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    10,285
    Likes Received:
    163
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Explain please.
     
  5. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    1
    Certainly, I responded in part to your request for a reading list. Do not remember which thread it was in.
     
  6. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The trinity
    Jesus death as a substitionary payment made to the father in my place for my sins
    Bible inspired word of God
    Second Coming
    Resurrection physical sense
    Saved ONLY by Grace thru faith!
     
  7. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thats a good list. :thumbsup:
     
  8. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So what is the main difference between his views and the gap theory view?

    As still have the BIG problem of not reading the genesis account in a literal fashion IF presupposing that there could have been "Billions of years" described there!
     
  9. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    the other things such as the timing aspect of the second coming, old earth/Young earth, spiritual gifts for today are important, but I do not elevate them to primary essential status!

    Would also add to original list though baptism and communion, but NOT any regeneration effect to be seen in either!
     
  10. Greektim

    Greektim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    138
    Faith:
    Baptist
    First, it is an extremely literal reading of Genesis. Moreso than the YEC view. Second, there is no gap. He is just saying that all of creation was done in 1:1. After all, Moses would be entrenched in creation mythology of chaos to order being the theme of creation accounts. Then vv. 2 and on are not about creation but about the preparation of the Garden of Eden, the promised land, amidst the chaos of creation. Therefore, you can't use the Bible to determine the age of the earth, b/c it doesn't say how much time elapsed after v. 1. Days, months, years, millennia? Doesn't say. It just focused on the place that God prepares to dwell with his people... a fitting theme considering the generation that Genesis was written (Exodus crowd).
     
  11. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    that makes more sense, but aren't we back to the same problem that if was a long time period between chapters 1/2, then we had death/disease/ etc before there was even the fall and sin entering into His creation?
     
  12. Greektim

    Greektim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    138
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Just to clarify, the period of time may or may not be long, and it is after 1:1 when creation happened.

    Second, Moses was acquainted w/ ancient mythic creation accounts which was all about chaos being overcome and order established. That is what Gen. 1:2ff is all about. The "land" was a waste land in disaray. God forms out of it paradise, a place for him to dwell with his people.

    Third, I recognize that problem, and that I don't have a good answer for it. But the biblical trajectory for me is not sin and death but rather God dwelling with his people in paradise. So it is not a question the Bible seeks to answer. Therefore, I don't speculate unless I must. I'm not willing to give up on this view and its immense biblical theological value b/c I can't square it well with my systematic theology.
     
  13. quantumfaith

    quantumfaith Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    6,890
    Likes Received:
    1
    I appreciate VERY much your eloquence and honesty when you simply don't know how to "square it all". I really like Sailhammer's perspective on the "land" (eretz). However, I do think his critical (intellectually speaking) views on related science is horribly shallow. I think this is probably so, in order that he not get lost in the weeds relative to the theological points he wanted to make.
     
  14. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Moses might have known of other myths, but the creation account we have penned from him in genesis was revealed to him by God Himself, correct?

    An the question of there being death and disorder with the good creation of God before the fall would seem to be unable to get around, and stay true to the entire bible!
     
  15. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Since the world attacks the truths of scripture and not always a particular book why not study scripture to be able to explain what the text teaches rather than spend our time what others write who may or may not understand Jewish thinking of the time. Very few seminaries and professors teach about Judaism duringt the time period of scripture and how Jews thought. If one does a search he will notice that little has been written on the subject for about a 100 year period until recently. For one to understand scripture well it takes a clear understanding of the historical context of scripture in such a way to understand how the words and ideas were understood then.

    For example the word immediately in Mark is used quite a lot. Understanding Judaism and how disciples were made helps to understand why those who were called followed Jesus immediately. Although Mt. 18:20 is often interpreted as prayer the background of that verse is discipleship in Judaism.
     
  16. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    wasn't it a given though that the early Church, and the jewish peoples, would see Genesis in the light of it being a relative short period of time ago, and that it was to be ;iterally read and understood?
     
  17. Greektim

    Greektim Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    138
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I'm sure young-earthers would like that. But you fail to recognize one huge thing: they are eastern thinking people... ancient near eastern. You are modern western post-enlightenment type of thinker. It is hard for us to see through their lenses. "literal" was a vague concept for them I think. History was not a matter of chronology but of a drama playing itself out. When something happened was minor compared to what happened and how it affected them at their present.
     
  18. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    From what I know there were several accounts of creation circulating at the time and what is recorded in Genesis is setting the record straight that God created. When we step outside of what scripture actually teaches then it becomes our opinion and should be stated that way. If we step outside of what scripture teaches and make the claim that our opinion is what scripture teaches then we make the claim that scripture and our opinion are equivalent. That is when the world attacks what we believe and those who do not understand scripture are confused.

    When I was a new believer I was a physics major in college and heard someone talk about the gap theory. It made no sense to me and from what I knew in science it made no sense at all. While trying to better understand that theory I found it fruitless and found that understanding scripture solved many attacks on Genesis.

    To state that the earth is young or old is an opinion which does nothing to serve others in living for Jesus and making disciples. It does not serve to facilitate an understanding of Genesis in light of its historical context and how a person with a Jewish background at the time would have understood those verses. We can easily say "God created".

    For example if we say God created everything then can we also say God created evil? If we say God created everything and that includes evil then must we qualify our statement so that an American understands how Jews thought. If we do not then then we leave that open to an interpretation an American would assume.

    John 15:16 "You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit, and that your fruit would remain, so that whatever you ask of the Father in My name He may give to you." The background of this verse is how disciples of a rabbi were made. It has nothing to do with election.
     
  19. thisnumbersdisconnected

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2013
    Messages:
    8,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would be nice for "old Earthers" to think that, I suppose. :smilewinkgrin:

    The truth is quite the opposite. Hebrew is an extremely literal language. The meaning of Hebrew words are always based on something tangible. In contrast, Greek words are based on intangible and abstract ideas, many of which can be vague and opaque -- if not explained by metaphor, symbol or clear example. In fact, it is said that God laid the foundation of truth in His Law in the tangible Hebrew, then developed the abstract concepts of heart, spiritual and conscience values by moving His message of the Gospel and His Son into the abstract of the Greek.

    A primary example is the Hebrew kapar -- atonement. In English, it means restitution, or reparation for a wrong or injury, and in religious terms means, repairing or making amends or expiation -- appeasement for sin, such as giving your neighbor $500 to "appease" him after backing your car into his new shrub pine and killing it. That's not what kapar means.

    In Hebrew, kapar means, for example, if we say something rude, offensive, insulting or hurtful to someone, they are spiritual enough and enough like God to ignore the rudeness, neither returning harsh words for harsh words, anger for anger or insult for insult. It does not justify a retributive action with the criticism that the previous act was insulting or unjust. It never even acknowledges it. They never have to mention it again, not letting it eat on them, privately causing great pain and grief, thus making them treat us, the rude insulting person, differently after the insulting event.

    Therefore, if we atone (kapar) for the offense, then that which the rude person we have covered and keep it hidden. It does not repair the offense, or deal with it at all, except for ignoring, covering and hiding it. If your nasty neighbor continues to offend, you may well be tempted to uncover the offense of long ago, bring it up and deal with all of them in one great angry revengeful attack. That’s not what God demands of us. He reserves vengeance for Himself.

    Atonement in Hebrew simply means “cover” -- quite literally “to sweep it under the rug,” deciding to deal with it later.

    And that is precisely what the blood of bulls and goats did with sins until Jesus came and His blood took them all away.

    OK, so I know the subject of your post was whether or not Hebrew is to be taken literally, but this was all to illustrate that it must be taken literally. To be sure, there is figurative language in the Hebrew, but it required the Hebrew writers to think "outside the box" of their language and construct sentences that demanded a figurative interpretation. Genesis is not written in that manner. It is to be taken literally in every aspect of it's narrative.
     
    #39 thisnumbersdisconnected, Jun 11, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2014
  20. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,549
    Likes Received:
    15
    Then what would you consider the tree to be in Genesis 2:9?
     
    #40 gb93433, Jun 11, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2014
Loading...