............
The Bush-Clinton Dynasty
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Rufus_1611, Jul 17, 2007.
-
-
"The Bushes and Clintons go way back. They have been fast friends for decades. Only a closely guarded media cover up has hidden this fact from the general public."
Hmmm. Interesting.
Yet he provides no evidence of such. -
What did you find out when you followed the below suggestion?:
-
of course, it's true... part of the cover up was the damaging of the computers when the Clintons left the white house.
And itr was Bush/Clinton together who got the Patriot Act passed... with minor help, of course, from the 9-11 attacks...
These internationalists are tricky people! -
That is, if he wishes to be taken seriously. -
More hysterical media cover up accusations. Silly.
-
First, the media was conspiring to keep down Michael Moore. Now, they're hiding a secret Bush-Clinton dynasty.
When do they have time to report the "real" news? :laugh:
From the piece:
The fact that big donors are donating to Hillary is no suprise. Big donors usually donate to both leading parties. It's been done forever. It's the corporate way of hedging bets. -
Poncho, Rufus, and one or two others make some good points about one world government, North American Union, and some other things. But getting so locked in to conspiratoral mindsets that you see a conspiracy lurking around every corner is not helpful. Sometimes people move in the same direction without consultation of each other and motivated by their own agenda. Trying to tie everyone in together is nuts.
-
It is really a mute point whether they are a dynasty or not. The fact is America has had enough damage done by both, and its time to make certain that neither ever returns to that office.
-
The Bush and Clinton family are overtly aligned to at least some degree as evidenced by Bubba and Poppa joining forces to stump for Asian Tsunami relief. W had plenty to hang Clinton on during the presidential transition of 2000 but let it all ride. Then you throw in some pretty respectable people with some pretty respectable credentials saying something fishy went on in Mena, and you have some pretty convincing covert alignment as well. -
Rufus,
You have a PM to check. -
-
What did President Clinton do to get the Patriot Act passed? All this is ridiculous speculation. -
You're letting facts get in the way of a good Internet conspiracy. What's the matter with you? :laugh:
-
I wish Chucky would stick to the Gospel, instead of this hysterical claptrap, aimed at GWB. I'm assuming he's a pastor.
-
............ -
-
This 1996 Act was passed by a 91 to 8 margin in the U.S. Senate and was signed into law by President Clinton. It contained a number of key provisions to combat terrorism, but the ones that immediately inspired the formation of a coalition against the legislation were three in particular: the provision making it criminal to provide "material support" or "expert advice or assistance" to terrorist groups; the provision allowing the use of secret evidence in terrorism cases; and the provision authorizing the U.S. Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Attorney General to jointly designate organizations as terrorist groups based upon available evidence.
This is how your reference describes Clinton"s "Patriot Act." But it says nothing about taking away our (previous) right of Habeous Corpus. Under Clinton's legislation I assume we still had to be charged with a crime to be held in prison and still had the right to an attorney. None of this is trus under the Patriot Act not to mention the right of the government to break into and search our homes without a search warrant. Is this what you call freedom? Is this America? I suppose most don't care because we have a Republican President and a "Christian" one at that. -