We are talking faith, why do you interject election at this point? </font>[/QUOTE]Because none possess saving faith except for the elect.Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Peter declared election as did John.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
We are talking faith, why do you interject election at this point? </font>[/QUOTE]Because none possess saving faith except for the elect.Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Peter declared election as did John.
Well you are coming closer to the truth by admitting that faith comes from within the man, and as scripture says Faith comes by hearing God's Word!And I am telling you that for every effect there is a cause. I say the cause is God's regeneration of the man that makes saving faith an inevitable manifestation of the new nature. It comes from within the man but it is caused by God, not man's goodness
NO! you are reading into what I said, what YOU want me to say! Stop it!Good. At least now you have acknowledged this much and we can move on to the implictions.
If it is merited then it is not by grace. Grace is by definition "unmerited favor". You are saying that it is merited favor that results in salvation.
No argument, if you are not saying that man must first be regenerated before he is able to take in the Word of God!No. I am saying that it comes from an inside source (the spirit of man) that has been regenerated by God.
The soil must receive the seed! Hard soil does not receive seed at all, Rocky soil may receive the seed but at the first heat, the new plant withers and dies. Weedy soil receives the seed, but the weeds prevent it from getting sunlight and warmth that it needs to grow and it is choked to death. Good soil receives (Accepts) the seed, but beware the birds! For that seed that does take root in Good soil produces vast quantities of itself.Try as you might, there is no decision nor merit on the part of the soil. Only the nature to support the seed or not.
Then what you are saying is this: Because faith is a human possession, All who gain faith in God through hearing his word, become elect!Because none possess saving faith except for the elect.
Yes, I agree with you that this is pivotal to the debate.That is the absolute pivotal point of this debate. Salvation is initiated by an act of someone's will... someone's will is preeminent in salvation. It is either God's with Him regenerating the elect thus leading to their saving faith or else it is man's whose belief is recognized by God and rewarded with regeneration.
My faith does not hinge on your impression of my thinking, or your 12 year old's. But you do prove the addage bring up a child in the way he should go and he will not soon depart from it. I hope that your 12 year old, learns to "think outside the box" so that in life he/she can receive the truth!Originally posted by rc:
Wes,
I'm sure glad you are impressed by your own thinking, because no one else is... including my 12 year old.
The soil must receive the seed!</font>[/QUOTE] You are implying free will for inanimate dirt. The soil doesn't "willfully" receive the seed. It receives the seed because of its nature.Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Try as you might, there is no decision nor merit on the part of the soil. Only the nature to support the seed or not.
Some people reject the gospel outright.Hard soil does not receive seed at all,
Some people give mental assent to the gospel but when they face tests of faith the lack of roots based in a genuine change of the spirit become evident.Rocky soil may receive the seed but at the first heat, the new plant withers and dies.
Some people like the rich young ruler are attracted to the gospel but can never leave the god's they already have in their lives.Weedy soil receives the seed, but the weeds prevent it from getting sunlight and warmth that it needs to grow and it is choked to death.
Some people have emotional experiences based on their guilt or sorrow or search for hope. The experience makes them feel better for awhile... but they never repent of those sins that caused their guilt. Those sins consume the seed before it takes root.Good soil receives (Accepts) the seed, but beware the birds!
... and who had control of the preparation of the soil? Hint: It wasn't the soil.For that seed that does take root in Good soil produces vast quantities of itself.
Yes, I agree with you that this is pivotal to the debate.Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
Scott J, </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />That is the absolute pivotal point of this debate. Salvation is initiated by an act of someone's will... someone's will is preeminent in salvation. It is either God's with Him regenerating the elect thus leading to their saving faith or else it is man's whose belief is recognized by God and rewarded with regeneration.
And the use of the two different expressions could cause confusion if you see them as contradictory. I don't. It is from God since God grants the new nature. It is personal since it truly is a free will act performed by someone with a regenerate nature.2. All through scriptures, 340 numbered verses contain the word faith, there are but a few instances where faith is expressed as Given By God to man. But MANY use the phrase "YOUR FAITH"!
And that is partly why I have avoided that kind of argument for the most part.The point is that the vast majority of uses of "FAITH" indicate that faith is within the person, not given to the person.
He didn't.There are even places where it is the faith of the unbeliever that is spoken of, such as "they placed their faith in other gods". How is it that God would give faith to those who place it in other gods?
From their unregenerate, totally depraved nature.If God did not give them their faith, where did they get it?
No.Are there other gods with the power to give faith in them to man?
There have been only a few occasions that I am aware of where I have contended that faith was given to people. Like I said, it is indirectly a gift... but more accurately, it is a direct result of a gift.2a, The most impressive situation appears throughout the Gospels where Jesus, whom you insist is the one who Gives faith to those who have it, most often uses the phrases, "Have faith", "Your Faith", "if you had faith..."
This either defeats both of our positions or it defeats neither. If this means it is the perfect will of God that none should perish then the universalists are right... let's go party.3. The will of God is that NONE SHOULD PERISH!
I agree. He changes one's nature and they freely believe.Now it can be assumed that God's will is preeminent in Salvation because it is God that saves.
No one thrwarts the will of God. God simply allows the non-elect to continue in their own will.Now whose will thwarts the will of God? The ones who do not come to faith in God, for they determine for themselves their eternal destiny according to the plan of God laid down before he created man.
Again, if the ultimate source, the prime cause, of this faith is an unregenerate man's choice then man is not saved by an act of God's grace but rather by the merit of that choice.Indeed, this point of Salvation is pivotal. We are saved through faith! who's faith? Man's faith in God!
So why do some who hear not believe? Are they not as "good" as those who believe?Where does man get faith? Faith comes through hearing God's word and believing.
That is the closest thing you have given to a direct answer to my question so I will be satisfied with it if you won't go any further.It is more in line with God gives man every reason to have FAITH, and expects us to have it when he comes looking!
Romans 9:20Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
Well why didn't the one who "conditioned" the good soil, do that to all the soil types, thus making them all able to support life of the spirit?
That is a flawed representation of what calvinists believe. I don't know of a calvinist that says creation had "nothing at all to do with it." Can you point me to one?The calvinist insists on election of the created being by Divine selection long before the existence of the life of the created being! Creation having nothing at all to do with it.
Are you even reading what I respond to you with?The non calvinist insists on free will of the created, and living being "by design" of the Divine. God created us with everything necessary to respond to HIM, but leaves the actual response up to us in accordance with the way that HE made us!
Correct, then faith must not be a gift of God because those who have faith in other gods had to get it from somewhere, if it is not from within!</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />There are even places where it is the faith of the unbeliever that is spoken of, such as "they placed their faith in other gods". How is it that God would give faith to those who place it in other gods?If God didn't give them their faith, where does their faith come from?He didn't.
Oooooh Really? Now you are saying that there are two sources of faith? How then can faith be a gift of God if it comes from a variety of sources?From their unregenerate, totally depraved nature.</font>If God did not give them their faith, where did they get it?
No.</font></font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Are there other gods with the power to give faith in them to man?
Salvation is not an "ACT of Grace". Grace is powerless to ACT! Salvation is what God does to man while God is being Gracious toward Man! IT IS ALWAYS GOD THAT SAVES, not grace, not even faith, those are only "whats", it is WHO saves and who gets saved that is important. God says that he saves man, God says that man must possess faith in order to be saved. If you call choosing to have faith Meritorious, then I am compelled to agree with you, because it is the merit of FAITH in man that God sees to determine the salvific value of man! Regardless, it is God who saves, and it is man who has faith that gets saved! AND our salvation is because God is behaving in accordance with HIS Grace toward us. It is imperative that we respond to HIM in FAITH!That is the closest thing you have given to a direct answer to my question so I will be satisfied with it if you won't go any further.
God "expects us to have it". Therefore, salvation is not an act of grace but rather a recognition of our merit by God.
At least that seems to be the direct implication of your answer. If you say it is not then please tell me how it is avoidable.
God doesn't individually give us breath. He gave us a nature that has as a part breathing.Originally posted by Wes, Outwest:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />There are even places where it is the faith of the unbeliever that is spoken of, such as "they placed their faith in other gods". How is it that God would give faith to those who place it in other gods?If God didn't give them their faith, where does their faith come from? </font>He didn't.
Oooooh Really? Now you are saying that there are two sources of faith? How then can faith be a gift of God if it comes from a variety of sources?</font>[/QUOTE] I have answered this question.</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />From their unregenerate, totally depraved nature.</font>If God did not give them their faith, where did they get it?
No.</font>[/QUOTE]Correct, then faith must not be a gift of God because those who have faith in other gods had to get it from somewhere, if it is not from within! </font>[/QUOTE] I have answered this question.</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Are there other gods with the power to give faith in them to man?
Salvation is not an "ACT of Grace".</font>[/QUOTE] That is near heretical. Of course salvation is an act of grace on the part of God... else it is not an act of grace on the part of God directly implying it is something merited... which doesn't seem to be too far from what you are indirectly saying.</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />That is the closest thing you have given to a direct answer to my question so I will be satisfied with it if you won't go any further.
God "expects us to have it". Therefore, salvation is not an act of grace but rather a recognition of our merit by God.
At least that seems to be the direct implication of your answer. If you say it is not then please tell me how it is avoidable.
Grace is nothing if it is not characterized by action. Grace is giving someone something they don't deserve. It is unmerited favor... favor without action is nothing at all. It is meaningless to the extreme.Grace is powerless to ACT!
You are playing semantics. This is just another way of saying that salvation is an act of grace on the part of God. Whether one is arminian or calvinist, this is fundamental.Salvation is what God does to man while God is being Gracious toward Man!
I didn't personify "grace" you went off on that rabbit chase all by yourself. Saying an "act of grace" is like saying "an act of kindness". You don't suppose that to mean that kindness acts of its own accord somehow do you?IT IS ALWAYS GOD THAT SAVES, not grace, not even faith, those are only "whats",
None of this is in particular dispute. Why do you make statements like this as if they were?it is WHO saves and who gets saved that is important. God says that he saves man, God says that man must possess faith in order to be saved.
Then you believe something that is contrary to the definition of the word "grace". It is not unmerited favor by which God saves man but rather "merited favor".If you call choosing to have faith Meritorious, then I am compelled to agree with you, because it is the merit of FAITH in man that God sees to determine the salvific value of man!
But that isn't consistent with what you just said. If man's faith warrants merit then it is inaccurate to say that it is God who saves. You must say that it is God and the man that save the man since God's power extends to the point where man's faith must take over.Regardless, it is God who saves, and it is man who has faith that gets saved!
That is NOT A POINT IN CONTENTION!!!It is imperative that we respond to HIM in FAITH!
Are you saying that the man who complies with God's command to have faith determines for himself to have said faith that makes him meritorious, and that his decision to comply is what saves him? NO! It makes him compliant with the command of God! God saves those who comply with Him, not those who don't! So we strive, put forth effort, educate ourselves, and then we belief and keep on believing, and brother that is FAITH that is compliant with God's command to have faith!But that isn't consistent with what you just said. If man's faith warrants merit then it is inaccurate to say that it is God who saves. You must say that it is God and the man that save the man since God's power extends to the point where man's faith must take over.
VERLAP between God's grace and man's faith, they are ALWAYs intertwined in that it is only WHILE God's grace is present that man can come to have FAITH! God does not give the man his faith! God's word taken into the man's memory does that by providing the man's spirit with knowledge that forms faith! IN A WORD? NO! Man's faith comes from the only place it can and that is from within the man!The point is where that faith ultimately came from.
My position: It comes from the regenerate nature that was a miraculous act of grace on the part of God.
Your position: It comes from within the man resulting in a cooperative saving of the man.
Is this an accurate summarization?
You are indeed the first to use the phrase "an act of grace". See "Scott J, 4,000 Posts Club Member # 945, posted 23-05-2005 10:10 in which you saidI didn't personify "grace" you went off on that rabbit chase all by yourself. Saying an "act of grace" is like saying "an act of kindness". You don't suppose that to mean that kindness acts of its own accord somehow do you?
Again, if the ultimate source, the prime cause, of this faith is an unregenerate man's choice then man is not saved by an act of God's grace but rather by the merit of that choice.
That is near heretical. Of course salvation is an act of grace on the part of God... else it is not an act of grace on the part of God directly implying it is something merited... which doesn't seem to be too far from what you are indirectly saying.</font>[/QUOTE]No, Saving man is an Act of God while he shows grace to his creation.</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Salvation is not an "ACT of Grace".
No! Faith is the reason for regeneration! There is no regeneration where there is no truth! Truth comes from the word of God, Truth spawns faith, and faith spawns regeneration! Just like God planned it!God doesn't individually give us breath. He gave us a nature that has as a part breathing.
I have answered this question numerous times. The faith is a manifestation of a regenerate nature.
For about the billionth time (an admitted exaggeration):How do you account for their lack of faith when it is God who gives man faith? Your position fails every test!
Not according to John 1 and 3. There we clearly see that a man is spiritually born of God (Holy Spirit) and not of his own will.No! Faith is the reason for regeneration!
Are you saying that the human heart is an independent source of truth?There is no regeneration where there is no truth!
Yes. It does. Noteably, the scriptures declare that the natural man cannot discern these things of the Spirit... that kind of backs you into another corner. Without the indwelling Spirit, man cannot understand... but you say he must understand and believe before being regenerated.Truth comes from the word of God,
Yep. Just like birth spawns conception.Truth spawns faith, and faith spawns regeneration! Just like God planned it!
Not according to John 1 and 3. There we clearly see that a man is spiritually born of God (Holy Spirit) and not of his own will.</font>[/QUOTE]I just finished reading John 1 through 5. . . again! I find nothing in them dealing with regeneration prior to faith. Perhaps you would care to present your facts that support your understanding.Originally posted by Scott J:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />No! Faith is the reason for regeneration!
Are you saying that the human heart is an independent source of truth?</font>[/QUOTE]How little you understand the human that God created. If you do not understand the natural how can you possibly understand the spiritual? The heart is the place where the knowledge of truth resides in man, however, the truth must be "heard" before it is deposited in the heart where the spirit of man is regenerated there by. [John 8:31,32]Jesus said: If you make my word your home you will indeed be my disciples; you will come to know the truth, and the truth will set you free. Regeneration comes from truth, truth comes from the word of God, and the truth is what sets us free from our sinful spirit...Thus REGENERATION!</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />There is no regeneration where there is no truth!
Yes. It does. Noteably, the scriptures declare that the natural man cannot discern these things of the Spirit... that kind of backs you into another corner. Without the indwelling Spirit, man cannot understand... but you say he must understand and believe before being regenerated.</font>[/QUOTE]Have you no understanding? Man hears...absorbs truth, then man accepts...believes. It is that hearing and believing that is regeneration. And before you jump all over that, NO it is not of man's doings! That is the way God made it!</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Truth comes from the word of God,