Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
I'll tell you what the real reason is most of you reject the KJVO position.
Most likely some admittedly over-zealous and therefore possibly offensive KJVO guy early on in his Christian experience ruffled your older sanctified, more intellectual, feathers. So you blew up like an indignant peacock.
And now you live-out that experience and militate against the KJVO because pride forces you to do so as you're committed now.
Some of you would be amenable to the position and see its merits, but you'll die snubbing it rather than correct your over-reaction to that KJVO-nutcase's over-zeal; not to mention all the flack you'll know you'll face since you yourself dished it out.
Click to expand...
Main reason that I am against KJVO is that it cannot by proved by either the Bible nor textually!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
No
Modern version though , such as Nkjv, esv, and the Nas, are intentionally seeking to corrupt or pervert the Bible, as KJVO assert!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
The KJVO use as the measuring line the TR and the KJV, so everything else to them would automatically be bogus!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
Or the Holy Spirit as an It, or when the Kjv did not agree with peter and paul that they were calling Jesus our great God and savior?
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
we have no Originals intact, so no perfect Bible, but we have a perfect Lord and savior!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
The Hebrew and Greek scriptures!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
He and I do not believe that the KJV has no mistakes or errors in it, do you?
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
There are many varying editions or revisions of the KJV, including likely over twenty present varying editions of the KJV.
There are even at least two new varying editions published by different publishers that introduced two new sets of variations when some printers switched to printing a computer-based text of the KJV beginning around the 1980's.
I know of no publisher that prints a post-1900 edition of the KJV that is 100% identical to the 1769 Oxford edition except for the 2017 reprint of that edition by the Bible Museum.
There would be around 400 differences between the 1769 Oxford edition and most typical post-1900 KJV editions.
Click to expand...
was not the 1873 Cambridge edition of the Kjv considered to be the "fixed" edition now?
Administrator
Joined:
Apr 8, 2003
Messages:
38,982
Likes Received:
2,615
Faith:
Baptist
Isnt that the one that the Apostle Paul used?
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
Administrator
Joined:
Apr 8, 2003
Messages:
38,982
Likes Received:
2,615
Faith:
Baptist
Nope, received by Moses!
Click to expand...
why do I keep forgetting that???
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
He used the hide of the calf, for calfskin!
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,204
Likes Received:
1,254
Faith:
Baptist
No
Modern version though , such as Nkjv, esv, and the Nas, are intentionally seeking to corrupt or pervert the Bible, as KJVO assert!
Click to expand...
The KJO may very well be wrong in there assertions, but so are your laxity as to caring as to the correct text or translation of the text.
Administrator
Joined:
Apr 8, 2003
Messages:
38,982
Likes Received:
2,615
Faith:
Baptist
If the KJO crowd are wrong - then there is no leg to stand on that the KJV is the only perfect translation/edition.
Either the KJV is perfect - or it is not.
Mind you - even if it not perfect
- does not mean that it is not a good translation.
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
Believe that the TR/CT/MT would agree around 95% of the time, and the differences between then affect no doctrines, same way between bible translation!
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
KJVO elevated the KJV to same position as Islam does Koran, as being eternal and perfect, almost like God Himself!
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,204
Likes Received:
1,254
Faith:
Baptist
The Spirit itself is in old English, is litrerally corect and a person .
Romans 8:16 .
Titus 2:13 , "Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; . . ." KJV, Paul. I think you are confused.
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Mar 19, 2012
Messages:
52,624
Likes Received:
2,742
Faith:
Baptist
The Spirit it
self is in old English, is litrerally corect and a
person .
Romans 8:16 .
Titus 2:13 , "Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; . . ."
KJV, Paul. I think you are confused.
Click to expand...
Kjv has in mind 2 persons there, but meant that Jesus was both God and Savior!
Joined:
Jun 17, 2019
Messages:
2,895
Likes Received:
298
Faith:
Baptist
The Autograph originals
Click to expand...
So you don't have a perfect Bible, nor can you give anyone a perfect Bible.
And this passes off for Christianity.
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,204
Likes Received:
1,254
Faith:
Baptist
So according to you it is ok to change God's word.