Reynolds
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 15, 2014
Messages:
13,796
Likes Received:
2,468
Faith:
Baptist
I am sure there are some looney ones out there I have not heard.
Moderator
Joined:
Aug 28, 2001
Messages:
33,514
Likes Received:
3,573
Faith:
Baptist
So, all those millions/billions of people from the beginning of time until the end of it who have not heard of Jesus will be condemned to hell. Doesn't sound like the God I know, or the God of the Bible.
Click to expand...
Who are condemned to Hell?
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,112
Likes Received:
1,246
Faith:
Baptist
And you know all of the ones
you do not know about are looney too.
Reynolds
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 15, 2014
Messages:
13,796
Likes Received:
2,468
Faith:
Baptist
Anything NEW in theology can pretty much be guaranteed to be un-Scriptural. Any theory about Soteriology that is Scriptural, I have heard of. If it has not made it into any of the Theology text books, it's pretty much guaranteed to be nutty.
So, what is this "third" theory you have
that perfectly harmonizes with every Scriptural passage?
InTheLight
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Dec 17, 2010
Messages:
24,988
Likes Received:
2,268
Faith:
Baptist
FreeBaptist said:
So, all those millions/billions of people from the beginning of time until the end of it who have not heard of Jesus will be condemned to hell. Doesn't sound like the God I know, or the God of the Bible.
Click to expand...
Jesus' words, which I know FreeBaptist reveres:
“He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." John 3:18
"He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him.” John 3:36
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,112
Likes Received:
1,246
Faith:
Baptist
Regareding what point of disagreemnt.
Two contrary views.
Only one can be right.
Both can be wrong, in which case a third view can be possible.
Reynolds
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 15, 2014
Messages:
13,796
Likes Received:
2,468
Faith:
Baptist
What is your third position?
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,112
Likes Received:
1,246
Faith:
Baptist
Regarding what?
Give an example of two contrary Bible interetations you think that neither can be correct.
Reynolds
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 15, 2014
Messages:
13,796
Likes Received:
2,468
Faith:
Baptist
Did I say neither was correct? No. I said both have scriptures that do not perfectly fit. Think back, We were discussing C vs A.
Joined:
Sep 23, 2018
Messages:
16,112
Likes Received:
1,246
Faith:
Baptist
Your the one who made that claim.
Both views are wrong.
Names are already in the book, only to be kept in the book (Revelation 3:5 ; 1 John 5:4-5 ) or not to be written there (Exodus 32:33 ; Psalms 69:27-28 ; Revelation 20:15 ).
Children are safe (Mark 10:14 ).
Once we become of age to be held responssible we must again become counted as children (Mark 10:15 ; John 3:3-4 ).
Reynolds
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Joined:
Jun 15, 2014
Messages:
13,796
Likes Received:
2,468
Faith:
Baptist
Start a thread on that one. It's a discussion of its own.
Joined:
Jul 4, 2000
Messages:
15,371
Likes Received:
2,405
Faith:
Baptist
As Free Baptist has been banned for denying the inerrancy of Scripture, this thread is closed.