I know RSR, but I was trying to give Ralph the benefit of the doubt, again. He still has not answered the question about the chapter negating the blood of Christ. It doesn't. I don't look for a fruitful response from Ralph in this matter.
It is quite clear from God's preserved word that Paul did not say "through his blood" in Colossians 1. Some overzealous scribes added to the word of God.
Adding to the word of God is wrong, even if the addition is correct doctrine. God gave us his word as he saw fit, and it is not up to anyone to add to it, and especially not up to POR to pretend like he can defend additions with impunity. It would be better just to go with what God said.
Yes, indeed, probably the same ones who did not translate "baptizo"(immerse), "ecclesia"(assembly), and "pascha" was translated "Easter" instead of "passover" in the book of Acts.
"Angelos" would have been better translated "messenger" in many places.
The Word of God is still without divine error--God cannot make a mistake.
Man can and does make errors quite often.
YOu are right James. The word of God is without error. No doubt, there are places in every version that could be better translated, but God's word remains the powerful sword that accomplishes His work.
Uh, so WHO are you more than anyone else? I see you've been real busy polishing your halo!
The Word of God just isn't proof enuf for you, is it?
I stand on the infallable, inerrant, inspired and PRESERVED Word of God, you seem to stand anywhere and everywhere you decide for yourself by YOUR opinion what the Word is, and is not. Seems that equates YOUR word with the Word of God? NOT!
Time you people learn not to "monkey" with the Bible, butt (billy goat language, some of yall will take some time to figure that one out, but you'll finally get it)..... you'll simply keep PROVING evolution to be true.... Hey! Hey! Yall are the Monkies! And people say you monkey around, you're too busy arguing, to find anyplace to settle down!
Oh, ok, so you're demanding an apology, well for what it's worth.... But you cannot decide which version is the Bible, so you think all the ones you'll approve are the Bible, so that places the ability only upon yourself as the one who preserves what you think the Bible is, and you are then placing yourself in the WRONG position and lording over the Bible, so really, and you'll see, I don't have any reason to apologize, but you still have time to change and correct your erroneous concepts.
I'm rerally having a problem, especially now, to see you as any authority, except your own.
Again, an unsubstantive post from Ralph, and continued avoidance of the questions asked, along with lies about myself. Ralph, you'll have a lot to give account for...I pity you.
That IS an attack. And THAT also places you in the role of the Greeks. It's no wonder no one can give you a hint of rational thinking, it's not UP too your level of Inter- I know-it-all, and I'll-tell-it-all-agence.
If you
really want to "compete", intellectually, be forewarned, you're dealing with the antics of the lunatick mind, so you don't have a chance, except maybe the snowball's chance... And then you have exposed your carnality, AGAIN.
Save your "pity", I sincerely DOUBT you even know the meaning of the word, you're posts are not even slightly showing any real pity, just self-righteousness and pitiful intellectual abilities.
And you were there when they "did this", weren't you?
No one added the principle to God's Word, and the MSS have been correctlty translated, it's yall's arrogance that denies the evidence, that has been proven countless times.
It amazes me how yall have appointed yourselves as the magistrates over the Word of God and that without ALL the MSS available to the KJB translators, ERROR!!!!