Because David was forgiven did not mean the consequences were removed, the baby died.
Because Mosses was forgiven did not mean the consequences were removed, he was not allowed into the promised land.
"Go and sin no more" does not remove the consequences of sin. In our modern times, some desire the consequences removed because of confession..
1 John 1:9 says God forgives and cleanses, He doesn't forgive and neglect, but purges and uses the consequences as living testimony for others.
One divorced can be forgiven, but must still bear the signification and responsibility "divorced".
For encouragement, do not neglect that God uses the Humble servant and opposes the proud and haughty. James 4:6 and repeated by Peter in 1Peter 5:5 which is based solidly on statements in proverbs, psalms, and the prophets all express the one humble and considered unfit is usable by God.
Example, Mosses and David. Both horribly sinned and carried the rebuke of sin , yet used by God
There is no "free pass" or "do over without consequences" given in the Scriptures as some would desire to read.
One divorced and remarried lives in adultery.
That is the clearest statement of Scripture.
When 2 people remarry, and were not covered under the allowed due to adultery/abandon clause, they are indeed committing in sight of God on the remarry adultery, but if both repent and confess that state to God, the blood of Jesus covers even that sin, correct?
The blood of jesus cannot cover for that adultery state then? God cannot accept the new marriage as being forgiven and moving forward, or he always see them in the state of adultery?
Jesus stated that adultery can nullify the Covenant, and the injured party free to now remarry in the Lord, and same for unbelievers departing due to not accepting jesus.
The view that you have would be more to me acceptable in regards to how the Lord views this issue in regards to if a person can still pastor or not, but not as strictly as you see it for remarriage.
It is not crystal clear because IMO this is the LORD's decision in the life of the believer hence the believer must present the circumstances to the LORD and seek His leading.
There can be instances when there was not a true marriage. e.g. A man is a bigamist (or a divorcee) and she marries him not knowing that he is already married.
She much later finds out that he is already married (to the first woman if she is still alive).
She should be allowed to marry (for real) another man.
You offer NO Scripture to support your claims on this matter, while others have offered Scripture to support what I have posted.
Prove to me by Scripture, or if you cannot, change your thinking.
For without Scripture, one could chase after what seems logical, pleasing, and sounds or feels good, but is not that built upon truth. Would you not agree?
IF 2 people were to remarry, and both are Christians, and repented-and confessed their sins to God, does the Lord see that new marriage as legit, or as adulterers forever more?
In some cases the letter of the law stands apart from justification and sanctification such as murder.
Abortion is done for convenience now-a-days.
A woman once told me she had her baby aborted for the sake of her other 2 children - it wouldn't be fair to them to give over so much of their time to the new addition.