It does not define faith as conviction.
???
1
Now faith is assurance of things hoped for, a conviction of things not seen. Heb 11
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It does not define faith as conviction.
1
Now faith is assurance of things hoped for, a conviction of things not seen. Heb 11
What you wrote was:If man cannot believe apart from regeneration, and if faith is the result of God’s prior work, then belief is caused by God. That is the Calvinist position. If you disagree, then you are rejecting the standard Calvinist order of salvation.
That is what I was objecting to. Man has free will to refuse the Gospel (e.g. John 3:19). But he will not believe the Gospel until He is born anew (or 'born from above'). The relevant texts are John 3:3-7; 1 Cor. 2:14. Why do men freely reject Christ? Because they have wicked unbelieving hearts. But once he is born anew, he freely repents and trusts in the Lord Jesus. The idea that Man does not have free will is a myth. No one comes to Christ kicking and screaming "Give me my freedom back!" No, no! They come willingly. 'Your people shall be willing in the day of your power.'Anthony Pritchard said:Man cannot choose to believe; God must cause belief.
That is the Calvinist position in one sentence.
Please do not confuse Calvinism with Hyper-Calvinism.
If you are born again but can reject the gospel, that is the end of perseverance of the saints.Man has free will to refuse the Gospel (e.g. John 3:19). But he will not believe the Gospel until He is born anew (or 'born from above').
There is not a single verse in the Bible that says “Get born again, then repent and be saved”.If you are born again but can reject the gospel, that is the end of perseverance of the saints.
Hebrews 11:1 defines faith as substance and evidence. Conviction is the result of believing, not the definition of believing. Saul’s conversion was a unique apostolic encounter with the risen Christ; it is not the pattern Scripture gives for ordinary belief. The gospel calls men to believe, repent, and come, and those commands presuppose genuine human agency.So, someone could convince you to believe in leprechauns? Did someone convince Saul that Jesus is Jehovah?
The inspired nouns in Hebrews 11:1 are hypostasis (substance) and elegchos (evidence). “Conviction” is an interpretive gloss, a paraphrase of one Greek word, in some English translations, not the lexical meaning of either word. The text defines faith as substance and evidence, not conviction.
Brother, Lydia actually illustrates the very point I’m making. Acts 16:14 is describing what enabled her belief, not what caused it. The Lord “opened her heart to heed the things spoken by Paul.” That opening was an act of divine enablement, giving her the capacity to respond, not an act of determinism that guaranteed her response.What you wrote was:
That is what I was objecting to. Man has free will to refuse the Gospel (e.g. John 3:19). But he will not believe the Gospel until He is born anew (or 'born from above'). The relevant texts are John 3:3-7; 1 Cor. 2:14. Why do men freely reject Christ? Because they have wicked unbelieving hearts. But once he is born anew, he freely repents and trusts in the Lord Jesus. The idea that Man does not have free will is a myth. No one comes to Christ kicking and screaming "Give me my freedom back!" No, no! They come willingly. 'Your people shall be willing in the day of your power.'
God did not drag Lydia into the kingdom against her will. Instead He 'opened her heart to heed the things spoken by Paul.' Christ laid down His life for His sheep (John 10:11). Who are these sheep? Well, there are many breeds of sheep; the Lord's sheep are distinguished by their ears and their feet. They hear the Shepherd's voice and they follow HIm (John 10:27). They are not forced into the kingdom; they freely hear and they freely follow.
All this is in line with the great Calvinistic confessions. Please do not confuse Calvinism with Hyper-Calvinism.
So, someone could convince you to believe in leprechauns? Did someone convince Saul that Jesus is Jehovah?