Which, of course, means you can't prove it so you cover up you inability to do so with jokes.
It doesn't seem to matter that this slur has never been proven, which means you are spreading malicious gossip, but it's OK since your target is a man you hate.
Have you forgotten Who you are supposed to represent?
P.S. Being forgiving doesn't mean I have to listen to neo-neocons shilling for their "unitary decidership" without trying to expose their contempt for our country and it's civil constitution.
" A nation can survive it's fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly.
But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor...He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of a nation...he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to feared." -
Marcus Tullius Cicero
Then you'll have to explain why you and poncho spread unproven and malicious gossip about the man.
I can't think of anything but hate that would drive that sort of viciousness.
Show me where Poncho has said that he hates George Bush. Dodge the issue all you want Carpro but you have proven my point and you are just as culpable as what you accuse Poncho of doing.
Translation: Being complicit in the systematic destruction of the U.S. Constitution and the United States Of America. Cuz it makes me feel all powerfull, and stuff.
Your word alone isn't going to be enough "proof" this time ole chum. Climb off yer soapbox and make with the facts already.
Is it really a secret that Poncho has nothing but distaste for this president? He calls him a traitor (without benefit of fact, all the while arguing that charges against him need to be proven by quoting him ... how double standardish). He routinely calls him a liar and attributes nefarious schemes to him.
I wouldn't think Poncho would run from that. I am not sure why he appears to be running from it now. If you don't like the guy (and you don't) don't hide behind "You gotta quote my exact words." If it's true, then it's true. Don't hide.
Pastor Larry , hasn't this thread been de-railed enough? Why do you want to continue talking about something that isn't even about the topic of the original post?
Larry,
I've given you and everyone else here the benefit of many many facts. You know that and you also know that they are no less fact just because you and a small group of others mistakenly percieve yourselves of having the sole power to discredit any facts or persons you do not like by ignoring, distorting and trying to keep people steered clear of them. What are you hiding pastor?
I would think it would be about time you started playing straight cards with everyone you being a pastor an all and start giving the people the real truth instead hiding behind all these meaningless lengthy speeches railing against it.
Whatever you said here has been thoroughly debunked before your fingers even hit the keyboard.
O.K., my bad. I quess by me merely saying something about it made me look somewhat hypocritical since more than half this thread has been about other things than the original topic including some of my posts.