Was Christ Resurrected For The Ungodly?

Discussion in 'Calvinism & Arminianism Debate' started by tyndale1946, Mar 17, 2015.

  1. BrotherJoseph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    166
    DHK,

    The word "world" in John 3:16 does mean only the elect when interpreted properly. The Greek word translated "world" in John 3:16 is Kosmos. Strong's Concordance of the Greek New Testament has this definition:


    Kosmos - orderly arrangement, i.e. decoration; by implication, the world (in a wide or narrow sense, including its inhabitants [Editor's Emphasis], literally or figuratively [morally]):— adorning, world.

    It can be seen from Strong's defintion that "world" can be interpreted in it's wide sense (every single person) or narrow sense (limited number of persons). Therefore John 3:16 does not automatically mean every single person. Here are some definitive New Testament passages that show how world (kosmos) is often used in a narrow sense.


    John 12:19 The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing? behold, the world (kosmos) is gone after him.

    Did the entire "world" go after Christ? Would to God that they had but unfortunately we know this wasn't the case then or now. World clearly does not mean every single person but rather the Pharisees were lamenting that large numbers of people had followed Christ then just as they do now. Indeed it is the "world" of believers who followed Christ and they are the ones God loved in John 3:16.


    John 14:17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world (kosmos) cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

    If "world" always means every single person then Christ would have just said no-one can receive the Spirit of truth. And Christ would have also included the Apostles among those who could not receive the Spirit of truth. But it is evident that every single person is not meant for Christ goes on to say that the Apostles did know the Spirit of truth who dwelled in them. It is also evident that all believers receive the Spirit of truth therefore "world" does not mean every single person.


    Ro 1:8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world (kosmos).

    When Paul wrote this epistle, did the natives of North and South America know of the faith of the church at Rome? What about many other people in the furthest places on earth? Did they know about the Roman Church's faith in Christ at that time? Paul is using "world" as a figure of speech to indicate that the faith of the Roman Church was known in a great many places by a great many people but not that every single person of earth knew about their faith.


    Ro 11:15 For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world (kosmos), what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead? Romans 11:1-32

    The "casting away of them" is referring to the the nation of Israel. The "reconciling of the world" is referring to the Gentiles. But if "world" always means every single person then Paul's statement makes no sense for he would have just said that God had cast away people that He reconciled. Thus, "world" here, as in other places, doesn't mean every single person.


    As far as the usage of the word "whosoever" in John 3:16 this scripture does not say, "whosoever believeth in him should not perish but get eternal life." That would make eternal life a condition to be met. Christ says whosoever believes has eternal life. In other words it is a statement of fact that those who believe, already have life
     
  2. Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Think that we have to come to the scriptures and try to understand them in the light of the entire witness of the scriptures, as how could God literally mean every one here, when he also has stated several times to us that not all will get saved?
     
  3. BrotherJoseph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    166
    aaaaaaaaaaaaaa
     
  4. Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,021
    Likes Received:
    3,653
    Faith:
    Baptist
    While I only quoted a smal section of what you posted none of it made your case that world only means elect. Such an interpretation is quite eisegetical. In fact you wrecked your entire argument when you made it known that the word is "kosmos" . That very word makes it impossible that your narrow eisegetical interpretation is fitting here.
     
  5. The Archangel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2003
    Messages:
    3,342
    Likes Received:
    235
    Faith:
    Baptist
    While I do not agree that "world" means "elect," your counter argument here about the meaning of "kosmos" is an example of the lexical fallacy.

    It is possible, as BrotherJoseph has pointed out, that "world" does not always mean "all without exception."

    After all, if it always means "all without exception," the Pharisees' confirm that all the world--everyone without exception--has gone after Jesus. And, we know from a whole host of evidences that is not the case.

    The Archangel
     
  6. BrotherJoseph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    166
    Rev Mitchell,

    As I pointed out, the same Greek word "kosmos" (meanding world) is also used in the same book by the same writer in John 14:17," Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world (kosmos) cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." Does the word "kosmos" here mean every human being who ever will live or only the "world" of unbelievers?
     
  7. Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,021
    Likes Received:
    3,653
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Interesting, so accroding to your use of the word "kosmos" the elect cannot receive Christ if you take your logic to its full potential.

    If elect was intended the word elect could have been used. Lack of its use is a clear enough argument against your position.
     
  8. savedbymercy New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Messages:
    6,058
    Likes Received:
    166
    No it doesn't mean the world, that would mean the world is Justified! We know that all the world without exception is not Justified before God, some are under His wrath John 3:36!
     
  9. BrotherJoseph Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,086
    Likes Received:
    166
    Rev Mitchel

    Are you going to answer my question from my previous reply to you? Here it is again, I said and never received a reply, "As I pointed out, the same Greek word "kosmos" (meanding world) is also used in the same book by the same writer in John 14:17," Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world (kosmos) cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." Does the word "kosmos" here mean every human being who ever will live or only the "world" of unbelievers? As far as my logic goes, if the word "kosmos" (world) as used in John 14:17 is only used in a limited meanings to discuss all the nonelect, it follows that the word "kosmos" (world) in John 3:16 could also be used in a limited meaning referring only to the elect.

    If you desire another examples from scripture beside John 3:16 that demonstrate the word "kosmos" (world) is utilized to refer only to the elect (without the word "elect" being used in the passage) see below-

    Ro 11:15 "For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world (kosmos), what shall the receiving of them be, but life from the dead?"

    Is the word, "world" in the preceding verse only describing the elect?
     
  10. Revmitchell Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    52,021
    Likes Received:
    3,653
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I did answer it. You may not like my answer but I in fact responded to your post. I suggest you deal with it as I gave my answer.

    I have never made the argument that world can only be used in an all encompassing manner. If you are going to argue that point you will have to find someone else.

    However, I will argue that the word world is always used in a general sense and never specific. You are trying to narrow it down to much to fit your position.