http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf0khstYDLA
The Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Coverup Revealed.
By now everyone has seen crisscrossing streaks of white clouds trailing behind jet aircraft, stretching from horizon to horizon, eventually turning the sky into a murky haze. Our innate intelligence tells us these are not mere vapor trails from jet engines, but no one yet has probed the questions: who is doing this and why. With the release of this video, all of that has changed. Here is the story of a rapidly developing industry called geo-engineering, driven by scientists, corporations, and governments intent on changing global climate, controlling the weather, and altering the chemical composition of soil and water — all supposedly for the betterment of mankind. Although officials insist that these programs are only in the discussion phase, evidence is abundant that they have been underway since about 1990 — and the effect has been devastating to crops, wildlife, and human health. We are being sprayed with toxic substances without our consent and, to add insult to injury, they are lying to us about it. Do not watch this documentary if you have high blood pressure.
Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
Other wealthy individuals have also funded a series of reports into the future use of technologies to geoengineer the climate
• What is geo-engineering?
• Scientists criticise handling of geoengineering pilot project
SOURCE
Google Search GEOENGINEERING
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length)
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by poncho, Feb 10, 2012.
Page 1 of 3
-
preachinjesus Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Maybe it's time to get the tin foil hats out.
-
Hey Chicken Little!:wavey: :laugh:
-
InTheLight Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
I'm going to do something different in this thread. I'm only going to respond to those who have actually watched the film and would like to discuss it in a civil manner. :smilewinkgrin:
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Well, Poncho I liked it because I saw some pretty compelling evidence in the film. Especially the studies that show the level of alunimum in the mountain streams has risen 50,000%! WoW! That can't be natural!"
"I thought the film was to amatuerish to pay attention to, now if it had been made by the Disney corporation or funded by other giant global corporations like those aired on PBS I might have found it more interesting and more credible."
"The part that got me was that little girl having lived her whole life basically in an organic garden but having such high levels of aluminum in her body."
"To far out of the mainstream consensus for me. Global governance? Please."
"Started reading that "own the weather" report. Whoa! An eye opener!"
"Went to sleep 20 seconds after clicking on the link."
"You know the RNC just wrote a resolution against Agenda 21. For a long time I thought it was just the vivid imagination of one those "conspiracy theorists", come to find out they were right about it all along! Wonder if they're right about this too?"
"The color was off a little it hurt my eyes. They should have filters on the cameras to make the sky blue."
"Did you see how those palm trees were falling apart?" -
exscentric Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Not sure but it seems the whole film has already been debunked so what is there to discuss Poncho. I mean all the argumentation and facts thus far seem to have taken care of it all! :tongue3:
-
-
When I clicked on the video channel's link, why am I not surprised to see it linking up other channels asscoiated with infowars, truthers, Alex Jones, and Ron Paul? These people are all like a school of fish. You are ever see one without the others tagged somewhere.
-
I'm going to guess...
Aerosal contraceptives? -
How has the elevated levels of aluminum been debunked? Y'all claim this or that has been debunked but you never give out information to back up your claims.
Why is that? You guys acuse me of making unsubstantiated claims while you do the same thing. How hypocritical. Prove it's been debunked! Show us the data! -
-
That's what passes for discussion these days?
Sorry some days I forget who I'm talking to here. -
What is it that you are looking for?
Do you honestly expect someone here to tell you what the contrails are and where the supposed aluminum is coming from?
Really? -
Maybe this will help you out...
http://contrailscience.com/what-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/ -
-
-
The article Targus posted is interesting lots of technical jargon and scienific looking charts. We got the same kind of reports from the "man made global warming" scientists too. We all know how that turned out don't we?
Michael Chertoff's cousin "debunked" 9/11 for us right? A 22 year old expert that cited something like 300 scientists in his famous Popular Mechanics article. Only trouble is he never actually referenced any of these 300 scientists. No way to do any fact checking. It was take it on faith. Faith in a 22 year old expert and faith in a government that has shown time and again that it lies and cannot be trusted.
I got one question if these are contrails as you few guys believe why is that some of them start go on for awhile then stop only to start back up some miles further down the flight path?
Wouldn't a contrail be one long line from begining to end?
In Targus' article they seem to assume the people who made the film have all the time and money in the world to do indepth research. These guys aren't scientists they're concerned citizens with a very limited budget. Scientists are well funded by the government and corporations and have all the time in the world to do research and yet we get ridiculous "hockey stick" charts relentless fearmongering and attempted coverups when they get caught in their lies. How professional is that? How trustworthy are these government/corporate employees?
Why would anyone take it on faith from people who's livelyhood depends on grant money from lying governments and monopolistic corporations? -
It's only exhaust, which includes water vapor.
Sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one. -
-
Normal commercial flights take place between 33,000 and 37,000 feet.
Why then are we seeing "contrails" much higher than what these commercial flights normally fly? Do they have to climb higher to reach a certain dew point? Is there a sweet spot up there or something?
Another question. Who holds the patent on the machine that's able to spray chemical particulates into the atmosphere? Answer, Hughs Aircraft.
Hughes Aircraft Patent # 5,003,186. Weather modification, chemtrails. Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming. A method is described for reducing atmospheric or global warming resulting from the presence of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere.
Yeah I know they have this patent "just in case" the need should ever arise. They promise to never use it unless it's really really really needed someday to protect us from man made global warming or is it climate change now that MMGW has been shown to be a joke and total global scam?
That reminds me. I took alot of gaff for questioning the idea of man made global warming here once upon a time. Turned out I was right. I heard what a kook I was for claiming Agenda 21 was a global conspiracy to erode our national soverignty, turns out I was right about that too. So tell me oh wise men of BB why do you never believe anything until a certain political party, the government or a conglomeration of conglomerated global corporations gives you the official okie dokie to believe it?
Probably the same reason you let the "liberal media" pick your republican candidates for ya I reckon.
Page 1 of 3