Lastday (Mel)
Thanks for that answer. There are several prophesies which seem to have more than one fulfillment. I agree with you that Jesus coming in power in his kingdom is future. But I also believe that this prophesy was also fulfilled on the mount of transfiguration, or it was a figure.
And I also believe the "great persecution" under Saul (Paul) in Acts 8-9 was a figure of a future persecution of the Jews that will be saved when Jesus comes in the future.
There seems to be quite a few prophesies that have a double fulfillment like this.
What led me to preterism....
Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Grasshopper, Aug 31, 2010.
Page 5 of 7
-
OK then I am spiritually seated in the heavens with Christ.
However I am more than spiritual, I have a body.
My spirit at the moment is seated in the heavenlies but my resurrected body some day also as well.
But because of what you say, I have come to the realization that you in all probablity don't believe that there is to be a bodily (flesh and bone) resurrection such as Christ experienced for those who believe on Him.
Perhaps I am wrong, but... (just in case)
Luke 24
37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.
38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?
42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
43 And he took it, and did eat before them.
BTW, Luke under inspiration also wrote the book of Acts in which he gives the account of Jesus in this flesh and bone body going up through the atmosphere to heaven with a promise of a return in "like manner".
Acts 1
6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?
7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.
8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
9 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.
10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel;
11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.
This same Jesus - not Titus.
Will come from heaven - not Rome.
So, this same Jesus of flesh and bone (not flesh and blood but flesh and bone made alive by the Spirit and not oxygenated blood) went on up through the atmosphere into heaven awaiting the "times of the Gentiles to be fullfilled" and then shall return in this same flesh and bone body (to the same place BTW, the Mount of Olives).
Back to the resurrection:
This same Jesus of flesh and bone whom John, (one of the apostles who handled Him when He appeared to them in the Luke 24 account) says the following;
1 John 1:1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;
ALSO says:
1 John 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
And Paul:
Romans 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
1 Corinthians 15
52 In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.
53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality.
54 So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in victory.
I therefore expect to have a glorified resurrected flesh and bone body just as He has while I await His return in His glorified resurrected flesh and bone body.
We shall be more than just spirit beings, we shall be like Him...
39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
HankD -
Winman,
I had a feeling we would agree. Misinterpretation of Matt.16:28
is an alledged prop for Preterism. The main reason I cannot keep
up with them is their total submission to a figurative approach to
the entire realm of prophecy which could not have been fulfilled.
BTW, please note that prophecy is a noun and prophesy a verb.
Mel -
Yes, Preterism relies heavily upon spiritualizing the scriptures. They also lean heavily on the writings of men like Josephus.
I answered Asterisktom immediately, he said he would gladly answer the verses I presented in Job. Must be digging out his favorite Preterist authors right now to see how they explain these verses away.
But usually he just ignores questions he can't answer. I've asked him about these verses before, he never answered. He'll be back after my question is buried under new posts. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Not everyone just lives right at the computer. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Bizarre, bloodless, resurrected Jesus
Um... flesh requires blood. The very act of eating - unless Jesus was just pretending to eat - requires blood.
But surely I am misreading you. Otherwise you believe in a Jesus that is similar to that of the Docetist, a Jesus who only seemed to be a resurrected normal human. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I lean heavily on the Bible.
My connection cuts out without warning. Instead of losing long post I will just write short ones for now. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Maybe if I put it in ALLCAPS:
CHRIST RESURRECTED WITH FLESH AND BONES.
So all of your verses are a waste of typing, proving what I am not denying.
And, though you are spiritually seated in the heavenlies, you expected to get your flesh up there too. Do you believe, then, that there will be a time when I cor. 15:50 will no longer be true, when God will change His mind and say "Flesh and blood now can enter in."? -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
In order to safeguard a cherished doctrine you make a greater error concerning the very nature of Christ.
Ok. Now I need to crack open those Preterists tomes..... -
Jesus very carefully pointed out to his disciples that he was flesh and bone, not mentioning blood, and he ate before them.
Or maybe you forgot that they pierced Jesus side and his blood flowed out. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Well, I take that back. Necessary for your bloodless Jesus.
Yes, the resurrection body of Christ was different. But normal enough to have fooled the two in Emmaus. They took him at first for a normal flesh-and-blood man. That would have required flesh, which would have required blood. I can't believe I have to even go this length, but:
1. Eating requires blood.
2.Walking to Emmaus requires blood.
3. Either Jesus was bloodless and pasty white - and the Emmaus disciples just didn't notice , or
4. Jesus "put on an appearance" (like in the Docetist heresy of the 2nd century) of normal (with blood) flesh.
You are typing yourself into a corner. -
-
We have much agreement here!
Once I realized the Apostles taught and believed Christ would return in their generation and they were the ones inspired by the Holy Spirit then it became obviously that Preterism was the only way to go. I don’t understand how people can think they are more inspired than the Holy Spirit.
Once I learned to view prophecy through the Preterist model all the prophecy and other scriptures harmonized and made sense like never before.
I should say that I enjoy the dispensational pundits who regal me with those exciting stories of a rapture, antichrist, battle of Armageddon, millennial reign, etc, but I don’t believe a word of it I just find it very entertaining. A biblical Grimm’s Fairy Tale if you will. I search out these latter day biblical yarn spinner’s where ever they can be found.
Prophecy becomes simplified by many degrees when you realize that there is no provision in the bible for the Old Covenant to end and then be restarted. There is no teaching down those lines from Christ, the Apostles, or anyone else. Once 70 AD brings down the curtain on the Old Covenant it’s just gone and along with it every last prophecy based around it.
If more people would just seek the truth with an open mind to what the bible says and an open heart to where the Holy Spirit leads we would all soon be full Preterists.
“Your understanding of the inspiration of Scripture is utterly astounding!” Mel
Why thank you Mel! -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
There are no "worms" in the text. The KJV's italics for the words show that they felt it was implied. The NKJV does a better job, as far as I can see.
25 For I know that my Redeemer lives,
And He shall stand at last on the earth;
26 And after my skin is destroyed, this I know,
That in my flesh I shall see God,
27 Whom I shall see for myself,
And my eyes shall behold, and not another.
How my heart yearns within me!
Questions come to mind as to who are the destroyers of verse 26. Some commentaries say that these could even be Job's miserable comforters. Neither do we have to insist that the end times are what we modern Christians think by that term. That term is not at all used that way in the OT.
The phrase "in my flesh" can also be translated "from my flesh" (as in "outside of my flesh"). The sense then would be, "Even though I am no longer in the flesh I will still see God."
If you look at a variety of commentaries - I mean scholarly ones from different centuries - you will find that there is a wide range of interpretation of this passages. So, then, why would you want to use this passage to help flesh out (no pun intended) your exposition of the much clearer and unequivocal 1 Cor. 15:50? -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I sent that first part up because I thought my connection would falter - again.
The best way to understand any problem passage in the Bible is to look within the same book first and see if we can't find helpful clues. And, sure enough, we do have such help in Job.
Having studied this out some more I believe that the Redeemer that Job was talking about and the meeting and seeing God is found in this very book. Job 42:5:
5 “I have heard of You by the hearing of the ear,
But now my eye sees You."
Job states in 19:26 his confidence that things will turn out right in the end, that he will "see God". This is exactly what happened here at the end of the book.
I am not saying that there are not New Testament themes glimpsed dimly. But I am saying that it is unwise for us to strictly pour New Testament details - post New Testament, in fact - into an obscure passage such as this. -
However, we are talking about our resurrected bodies as well.
We wont be flesh and blood but we will have a body like His a glorified resurrected body of flesh and bones.
Christ has been made alive by the Spirit of God and although He doesn't need food, He can eat food if He desires to do so as He did after His resurrection with the apostles and so shall I as He has promised that "we shall be like Him" when He appears.
1 Peter 3:18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
Both John and Paul confirmed the resurrection of our bodies (believers) under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
Yes, for mortals eating food requires blood but I think our Father in Heaven can figure out for us how to make glorified and resurrected bodies that can eat food and consume/assimilate it without blood as He did for His Son and He will make that provision for us as well as He promised His apostles.
Luke 22
28 Ye are they which have continued with me in my temptations.
29 And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;
30 That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
No matter what our view, here we have the apostles being promised to be able to eat and drink at Christ's table in the Kingdom of God. Not only that but they will sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
1 John 3
2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
HankD -
-
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Your belief is apparently very similar to Winman's, belief in a flesh-and-bones resurrection body has its own set of serious problems. Please see my posts to Winman on this. Posts 86 and 91. -
asterisktom Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
Or do you believe that all of believing Israel will be enjoying eternal life under the shade of their own personal vine and fig tree?
Or do you believe that Satan was bound with a literal chain?
I could go on and on. -
HankD
Page 5 of 7