David Horowitz in Front Page Magazine documents recent foreign policy failures and speaks about How Obama Betrayed America. He makes this observation:
"In the four years since Obama’s first inauguration, almost three times as many Americans have been killed in Afghanistan as in the eight years of the Bush administration. Withdrawal, not victory, has been Obama’s goal from the outset, and now it is the only outcome possible. During the Obama years, there have been more than 8,000 Islamic terrorist attacks on “infidels” across the globe, a twenty-five percent rise over the years in which the fighting in Iraq was at its height. Yet, in the face of this bloody and intensifying Islamist offensive, Obama has tried to convince the American people that the war against al-Qaeda has been essentially “won” — by him — and the terrorist threat is subsiding. Denial of the war Islamists have declared on us and denial of the threat it represents is the heart of the Obama doctrine that has guided this nation’s policies for more than four years."
Here is the link to David Horowitz: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/how-obama-betrayed-america/
So the question to you is what should be done?
What should US foreign policy be?
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by church mouse guy, May 8, 2013.
Page 1 of 2
-
church mouse guy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
-
It seems the whole premise of this article is based on a false assumption. With all the information the author has access to I can only conclude this intentional. First of all it's not Obama's foreign policy he's just a telemprompter reading servant of foreign banks and corporations. It's their foreign policy. America's foreign policy is formulated by corporate funded think tanks. Most of these corporate backers are transnational meaning they have no loyalty to this or any other country. Google "Brookings Institute" for instance. Who are the corporate sponsors? They're the same transnational corporations that back La Raza. Look it up. Better yet read the blueprint for their foreign policy. It's posted on Brookings website as "which path to Persia" this is the plan Obama is following. It's not a failure at all. Everything is going according to plan. Go read it and Compare it to what's been going on.
-
Revmitchell Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I think someone needs their meds.
-
I may need some of those meds -
I have just come across info that proves that Baptist Board is controled by policy formulated by corporate funded think tanks. Most of these corporate backers are transnational meaning they have no loyalty to this or any other country. -
-
-
church mouse guy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
I don't know what false assumption that you are talking about as you do not specify exactly. As for the Brookings Institute, it is a liberal Democrat site and I do not know what link you want me to read because the Path to Persia book had a lot of panel discussions associated with it that come up when you search Brookings.
We all object to what Obama has done on the question of Iran, and that is part of what David Horowitz is talking about--the mishandling of the war against Islamic terror. -
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/108902116?width=569 The false assumption is that it's Obama's policy.
-
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1980974#post1980974 (post #65) -
Background: Within the library of the Brookings Institute you will find the blueprints for nearly every conflict the West has been involved with in recent memory. What's more is that while the public seems to think these crises spring up like wildfires, those following the Brookings' corporate funded studies and publications see these crises coming years in advance. These are premeditated, meticulously planned conflicts that are triggered to usher in premeditated, meticulously planned solutions to advance Brookings' corporate supporters, who are numerous. http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/naming-names-your-real-government.html?m=1 Your real government.
The Rev isn't a fool Arbo he's hip to the globalists. Looks like it's still just you and Spaceboy. -
church mouse guy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
The question is what should we do to get out of this mess? -
It's not about right or left. It's not Bush's policy or Obama's policy at all. It's the policy of foreign banks and corporations. The first thing we need to to "fix" it is to stop looking at it as a left vs right issue because it isn't. It's a case of we the people vs the forien banks and corporations that have hijacked both wings of our government.
If we keep looking at as a left vs right issue then we'll just keep arguing amongst ourselves about it until the banks and corporations have eaten the whole substance of our country and enslaved us all just as Thomas Jefferson predicted 200 years ago.
In order to get out of this mess we must first understand who's policy y it really is. -
Sounds more like a war of terror than a war on terror.
What do you suggest we do to get out of this mess? -
-
-
I just find it interesting that you can't admit you're wrong in public. Why not send me another secret pm and ask for forgiveness again? "Gee Poncho I'm awful sorry I acted like an idiot towards you. If you forgive me I promise to be more open minded".
What ever happened to that?
My challenge still stands. There's a thread already posted. Waiting. -
"...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us."
-
-
church mouse guy Well-Known MemberSite Supporter
As for what to do, David Horowitz thinks that the GOP abandoned the war in Iraq along with the Democrats, who originally supported the war and called for it themselves when Clinton was President in a 1998 resolution. The Democrats had access to the same intelligence as Bush and they supported Bush, according to Horowitz.
However, now Iraq is at the mercy of Iran and the Islamic Shiite jihadists.
So Horowitz wants the GOP to stand up and resume leadership in the war against Islamic terror to provide for national security. Thus the decision has to be made by the GOP on what to do about Afghanistan. Clearly, Islam has to be contained as communism was and Islam has to be isolated economically. The Arabs and other Islamists are much more polite when they are broke.
Domestically, we need to follow Mosque-Buster in England and stop the construction of Islamic facilities on American soil. -
Bro. Curtis <img src =/curtis.gif>Site Supporter
"It's easy. We marched 'em in. We can turn around and march 'em out"
Ron Paul ( 2008 Republican debates)
After leaving we can talk about changing our foreign aid policies.
Page 1 of 2