-
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages:
- 19,715
- Likes Received:
- 585
- Faith:
- Baptist
Your exclamation marks are meaningless when your sentences are so stupidly put. Can't you take some extra time to look over your posts? Do you even care?
-
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages:
- 19,715
- Likes Received:
- 585
- Faith:
- Baptist
"Inclusible" huh?
Look at my post #21 and tell me if you have any problems with the ESV renderings.
Look at post #35 by Nodak and see if he makes sense.
-
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages:
- 52,624
- Likes Received:
- 2,742
- Faith:
- Baptist
I just wonder why so much love and supportfor a transltion that became worse, not better, when revised?
-
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages:
- 19,715
- Likes Received:
- 585
- Faith:
- Baptist
Reply to the above Y-man.
-
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages:
- 52,624
- Likes Received:
- 2,742
- Faith:
- Baptist
I don't have real problems with any off those listed, just with the liberties taken in the 2011 revision!
-
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages:
- 19,715
- Likes Received:
- 585
- Faith:
- Baptist
Good! The rest of inclusive language in the CSB,NLT, NETand others is just as innocuous.
-
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages:
- 52,624
- Likes Received:
- 2,742
- Faith:
- Baptist
All of them are acceptable to use, but theNasb/Nkjv are much preferred forserious studies!
-
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages:
- 19,715
- Likes Received:
- 585
- Faith:
- Baptist
For some folks,
but not for all.
-
Yeshua1
Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
- Joined:
- Mar 19, 2012
- Messages:
- 52,624
- Likes Received:
- 2,742
- Faith:
- Baptist