i'm going to hold my nose and vote for McCain as the lesser of 2 (or 3 right now) evils; unless he decides to go left for a VP.
Who would you vote for
Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by Salty, Apr 5, 2008.
?
-
I would vote for Clinton, but not Obama
1 vote(s)3.7% -
I would vote for Obama, but not Clinton
2 vote(s)7.4% -
I plan to vote for McCain
14 vote(s)51.9% -
I plan to vote for Ralph Nader
0 vote(s)0.0% -
I plan to vote for another 3rd party
4 vote(s)14.8% -
With the current candidates, I would not vote
3 vote(s)11.1% -
Other Answer
3 vote(s)11.1%
Page 2 of 2
-
-
I really like Alan Keyes. He is certainly a step above McCain/Obama/Clinton.
-
The problem is you have no ideas on how to govern. All you can do is criticize. Liberalism is not a governing philosophy, it is an excuse to be a leech. Words such a "hope", "future", and "change" put in a speech at random without any substance solves no problems. On the other hand, you have a candidate so power hungry and self centered that I would hazard to guess what lengths she would go to acquire power.
Roosevelt, Truman, and Kennedy, yes even Johnson, would turn over in their graves if they knew the clowns you had picked for the nomination in the last several years, stellar names such as Obama, Clinton, Clinton, Kerry, Dukakis, Mondale, McGovern, etc, etc, etc. oh and Gore. Lets not forget Gore.
Roosevelt, Truman or Kennedy could have run against any of these in an election as much as the Republicans do today. The Democratic party is not the party of high ideals it was 40-50 years ago when it really represented the working man. It has turned into a nut case clearing house that represents every freak show and perverted cause in town. -
Yep...those guys are pretty "low".
Page 2 of 2