So think that IF one really does hold to be able to lose their salvation due to God honoring their free will, that tells me that their free will was the basis of them getting saved, Not the Will and working of God!
Yes, we are all well aware of how Calvinists view Arminianism, i.e. man-centered.
What we are looking for is a first hand statement of an Arminian leaning poster!
They hold at least two very different views, Classical foreseen faith election and the newer Corporate election.
It is the detail of how exactly do they think they spiritually enter the body of Christ that I am seeking to discover.
Jesus died for all mankind to provide the opportunity and provision for salvation of all mankind.
Then we God credits a person's autonomous faith as righteousness, God puts that person in Christ spiritually where they receive the reconciliation provided by Christ's death.
This view has the advantage of being logical and consistent with all scripture.
God desiring all men be saved yet Christ dying only for some men is illogical.
That wasnt where I was taking it Yeshua but thats a good point. Here is another;
If a person believes the efficacy & power of Christs atonement is limited....right.:smilewinkgrin: Isnt that a limited atonement?
Yet another false assertion, devoid of actual support in scripture.
Yeshua1 simply repeats the doctrine and never addresses the verses that demonstrate it is false.
Fallen men can understand the milk of the gospel, 1 Corinthians 3:1-3.
We all sin so there is none who are righteous, none who seek God when sinning or by the works of the Law.
But the lost can seek God effectively through faith, Romans 9:30-33.
You mean like in Isreal among the jews when jesus came? That ONLY the faithful remnant that God had chosen to receive jesus actually were given 'ears" to hear and believe, rest stayed in the dark?
All you do is ignore scripture and then present yet another made-up fictional assertion.
Romans 11 does not say Jesus gave ears to the believing Jews, it says God hardened the hearts of the unbelieving Jews.
Anyone who reads Romans 11:4 can see that God chose to keep 7000 men who had not bowed to Baal.
Again Calvinists read this as saying God kept the 7000 from bowing to Baal, but it actually reads that God choose to keep the 7000 who had been faithful, rather than cause their faithfulness.
Yet another case of shoddy bible study.
1 Cor. 3: These people were believers (infants in Christ, God's field, God's bulding, the temple of the holy Spirit)
The infants were being spoken to as men of flesh because they could not understand spiritual meat.
Therefore men of flesh can understand spiritual milk.
Matt. 23:13 - No one is entering heaven in this verse...quite the opposite
Scripture says the opposite, they were entering heaven.
Just read the verse folks, just read it.
Matt. 13 - This parable could be read with either a cal. or arm. perspective...we must go elsewhere. More pay no attention to the man behind the curtain evasion, it reads that three of the four soils were receptive to the gospel, therefore total spiritual inability is false doctrine.
Rom. 9:30-33 - One of many verses that speaks of coming to Christ through faith...the question is what is the origin of that faith.... We have been all through this, our faith provides our access to God's grace, Calvinism asserts the opposite of Romans 5:2
We are regenerated, born anew as children of God after we have believed, John 1:12-13
Also, You are reading extra stuff into Rom. 3:10-11 that isn't there.[/QUOTE]Somehow you missed that I said Calvinism adds "at any time" to the text, and I added "while we are sinning".
But I justified my understanding because it does not create a conflict with Matthew 23:13 and Matthew 13:1-30
God chose to leave them, not enable them.
Calvinists consistently rewrite scripture to pour their false doctrines into it.
The 7000 were obedient, and did not bow, so God chose to leave them alive.
The scriptures are clear, God choose to save existing men whose faith God credited as righteousness.
You can rewrite it till the cows come home, but anyone who can read can read Romans 11 and see that fallen men have hearts that can trust in Christ, and that must be hardened to preclude trusting in Christ.
Jesus Himself said that ONLY those whom the Father gave Him shall be saved, that the lord has to open up their hearts.minds in order to have them respond by placing faith in Christ!
Sinners cannot come to Jesus apart from the work of the Holy Spirit applied to them in order to have them received jesus and conform their election from God as being sure!
Yeshua1 never stops making assertions without biblical references.
Does the Lord have to open folks hearts and minds with His revelatory grace in order for them to respond?
Yes.
Does God need to alter them with irresistible grace?
No, and shown again and again and again.
Matthew 13:1-30 teaches 3 or 4 kinds of people have the ability to respond affirmatively to the milk of the gospel.
Paul teaches men of flesh can understand the milk of the gospel.
Matthew 23:13 tells of men entering heaven, thus being able to respond successfully, but then they are blocked, showing whatever grace they received in order for them to respond was not irresistible.
The scriptures are clear, God chooses to save existing men whose faith God credited as righteousness. You can rewrite it till the cows come home, but anyone who can read can read Romans 11 and see that fallen men have hearts that can trust in Christ, and that must be hardened to preclude trusting in Christ.
Calvinism cannot be defended, so its acolytes simply repeat unreferenced assertions, in effect demonstrating they have no biblical support.